Re: [vpp-dev] [honeycomb-dev] jVpp as independent fd.io project

2016-10-27 Thread Ni, Hongjun
Hi Thomas, This picture just takes NSH_SFC plugin for example. You could replace it with any other plugins. They share the same framework. Thanks, Hongjun From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Thomas F Herbert Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 9:55

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

2016-10-27 Thread Thomas F Herbert
On 10/27/2016 12:11 PM, Feng Pan wrote: I agree with Chris here. I also want to bring Centos into the conversation, Centos 7.2 ships with QEMU version 1.5.3 by default and 2.3.0 in qemu-ev channel, both of those supported versions in Centos contain backports from newer releases. I think it

Re: [vpp-dev] Clean-up tasks: 17.01 F0 -> RC0

2016-10-27 Thread Dave Barach (dbarach)
It's an SMT [simple matter of typing] to create a number xxx.api files, related message handler implementation files, and to place them next to whatever the indicate API collection controls. The current setup is a historical artifact. Thanks... Dave From: Luke, Chris

Re: [vpp-dev] Connecting Vpp to a physical NIC.

2016-10-27 Thread Shravan Ambati
Thanks Klement! That worked. From: Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) [mailto:ksek...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:17 PM To: Shravan Ambati Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Connecting Vpp to a physical

[vpp-dev] Connecting Vpp to a physical NIC.

2016-10-27 Thread Shravan Ambati
Hi I am new to vpp and I was trying to connect a pci interface to vpp. I am using stable/1606 branch. As per instructions in the following the wiki https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/How_To_Connect_A_PCI_Interface_To_VPP I have appended the pci address to the startup config file - dpdk { socket-mem

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] [Rpm_dpdk] Centos 7 support in Infra and CSIT

2016-10-27 Thread Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
Tom, thanks for “barking” to the mailer :) Per Dave’s note, Centos is indeed on CSIT project to-do list for some time. Your proposal is also very timely as some consumers of Centos, namely OPNFV/FDS have been “crying” to get it covered in CSIT too - per notes from the last CSIT project call. But

[vpp-dev] Clean-up tasks: 17.01 F0 -> RC0

2016-10-27 Thread Dave Barach (dbarach)
Folks, I'd like to suggest that we undertake several clean-up tasks once we reach the 17.01 F0 (API freeze) milestone: *Clean up Coverity warnings *Split .../vpp/vpp-infra/{vpe.api, api.c} into groups of related APIs, to reduce future merge collisions *Finish

[vpp-dev] Centos 7 support in Infra and CSIT

2016-10-27 Thread Thomas F Herbert
fd.io Folks, I apologize in advance for "barking" on all the fd.io lists but this topic really is cross functional, I want to formally propose that we add Centos 7 server to CSIT. The purpose would be to: 1. Perf and func tests of Centos deployment of VPP and Honeycomb etc. 2. Func and

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

2016-10-27 Thread Feng Pan
I agree with Chris here. I also want to bring Centos into the conversation, Centos 7.2 ships with QEMU version 1.5.3 by default and 2.3.0 in qemu-ev channel, both of those supported versions in Centos contain backports from newer releases. I think it would be helpful if a commit (or set of

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP project committer nomination: Neale Ranns

2016-10-27 Thread Dave Wallace
+1 On 10/26/16 1:30 PM, Dave Barach (dbarach) wrote: I would like to nominate Neale Ranns as a vpp project committer. Neale designed and built the vpp FIB 2.0, a massive contribution. History of Neale’s merged contributions to the vpp project:

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

2016-10-27 Thread Damjan Marion (damarion)
Yes, we should not break QEMU 2.5 compatibility, specially if that version is default version provided in ubuntu 16.04. IMO we need to test both with 2.5 and 2.7 as long as ubuntu 16.04 is in game. My understanding so far was that this is only "2.5-RC1" issue. On 27 Oct 2016, at 09:56, Peter

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP project committer nomination: Neale Ranns

2016-10-27 Thread Dmitry Bufistov
+1 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:33 AM, wrote: > > Would the current vpp committers please vote (+1, 0, -1) by email to > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io no later than Tuesday, 11/1 at 11:59pm EDT? > > +1 (without doubt). > > Cheers, > Ole > >

Re: [vpp-dev] [honeycomb-dev] jVpp as independent fd.io project

2016-10-27 Thread Maros Marsalek -X (mmarsale - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Hey Ray, >From usability perspective, you are right, JVPP is not useful outside of VPP. But on the other hand, VPP plugins are also not useful outside of VPP but they still get dedicated projects. Same applies for Honeycomb (the VPP specific distribution of HC at least), it is not useful

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP project committer nomination: Neale Ranns

2016-10-27 Thread otroan
> Would the current vpp committers please vote (+1, 0, -1) by email to > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io no later than Tuesday, 11/1 at 11:59pm EDT? +1 (without doubt). Cheers, Ole ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

2016-10-27 Thread Pierre Pfister (ppfister)
Oh. Just notices you merged. I actually merged and pushed too... So a new test is started. Will probably fail. Ideal Qemu would be 2.7. 2.5 is *old*. And the failing qemu was 2.5-rc1. Anything above 2.5-rc1 should be good. - Pierre Le 27 oct. 2016 à 07:36, Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON