[vpp-dev] VPP's QoS functions

hello all, I'd like to know the usecases and usage of the following commands because I think they are related to QoS function. Are there any usecases or operation samples? - policer : https://docs.fd.io/vpp/18.07/clicmd_src_vnet_policer.html - qos :

[vpp-dev] Draft VPP 18.04 release notes

All, A first pass at the release notes for VPP 18.04 are available for review in https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/12038/ . I have not yet walked the commit history looking for juicy key features to include in the list, I'll do that tomorrow. Suggestions are, of course, welcome! A preview can be

Re: [vpp-dev] VLAN to VLAN

any suggestions? Thanks

Re: [vpp-dev] Question of worker thread handoff

Hi Damjan, I would say there is nothing we can do but to drop the packets. Developers have to take care of how to use handoff mechanism. In our case or NAT case, it has to be ‘no wait’, while it could be ‘wait forever’ in a stream line mode – worker A -> B -> C. BTW, my colleague Lollita

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP with DPDK eventdev

I’m not aware of such activities, but before you start working on the actual implementation i would suggest community discussion on architecture, use cases and required changes in the code. Biweekly community call is likely good forum for that. — Damjan > On 22 Apr 2018, at 07:17, Andrew

[vpp-dev] VPP with DPDK eventdev

Hi all, We were wondering if anyone is currently working on getting VPP to work with the DPDK eventdev? We don't want to duplication. Thanks, Andrew -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#9032):

[vpp-dev] Config file for QoS

Hi I want to set qos parameters according to this tutorial [1], but i couldn't find the file for port, subport and pipe configurations. Can you please help me in this matter? Best regards Reza Links: -- [1] https://docs.fd.io/vpp/16.12/qos_doc.html

[vpp-dev] Reminder: stable/1804 will release on Wednesday!

All, A reminder that VPP 18.04 will be released this Wednesday, April 25th. We're still accepting critical bug fixes, but at this point I expect few patches between now and then. That said, feedback on the stability of the branch is always welcome. Cheers, Chris.

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp vpls configuration

Hi, Please try: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/12014 you don’t need a next=hop when specifying an L2 receive path, so: mpls local-label add eos 1023 via l2-input-on mpls-tunnel0 regards, neale From: on behalf of "omid via Lists.Fd.Io"

Re: [vpp-dev] question about set ip arp

HI Xyxue, Can you please test to see if the situation improves with: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/12012/ thanks, neale From: on behalf of xyxue Date: Friday, 20 April 2018 at 11:31 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [vpp-dev]

Re: [vpp-dev] Question of worker thread handoff

Dear Kingwel, What would you expect from us to do if A waits for B to take stuff from the queue and on the same time B waits for A for the same reason beside what we already do in NAT code, and that is to drop instead of wait. -- Damjan On 23 Apr 2018, at 14:14, Kingwel Xie

Re: [vpp-dev] Question of worker thread handoff

Hi Ole, Damjan, Thanks, for the comments. But I’m afraid this is the typical case that workers handoff to each other if we don’t want to create an I/O thread which might become the bottleneck in the end. Regards, Kingwel From: Damjan Marion (damarion) [mailto:damar...@cisco.com] Sent:

Re: [vpp-dev] Question of worker thread handoff

Kingwei, Yes, it's possible to dead lock in this case. We had a similar issue with the NAT implementation. While testing I think we ended up dropping when the queue was full. Best regards, Ole > On 23 Apr 2018, at 10:33, Kingwel Xie wrote: > > Hi Damjan and all, >

[vpp-dev] Question of worker thread handoff

Hi Damjan and all, We are currently thinking of how to utilize the handoff mechanism to serve our application logic – to run a packet re-ordering and re-transmit queue in the same worker context to avoid any lock between threads. We come across with a question when looking into the

Re: [vpp-dev] mheap performance issue and fixup

Did you delete the handle of the shared memory? These two files: /dev/shm/global_vm vpe-api The mheap header structure is changed, so you have to ask vPP to re-create the shared memory heap. Sorry, I forgot to mention that before. From: 薛欣颖 [mailto:xy...@fiberhome.com] Sent: Monday, April

[vpp-dev] #vpp vpls configuration

Hi, I configure vpls with  following commands: VPLS configuration: MPLS L2VPN VPLS PE1 1.create host-interface name eth0 2.create host-interface name eth1 3.set int state host-eth1 up 4.set int state host-eth0 up 5.set interface mac address host-eth0

Re: [vpp-dev] mheap performance issue and fixup

Hi Kingwel, After I merged the three patch ,there is a SIGSEGV when I startup vpp (not every time). And the error didn't appear before . Is there anything I can do to fix it? Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. clib_mem_alloc_aligned_at_offset (size=54, align=4,

Re: [vpp-dev] Dynamically attach to a PCI device

I'll clarify my question For a PCI device e.g. :04:00:0 - is it possible to add this device to VPP on runtime with a specific cli command ? Currently I only can add these kind of devices by specifying it in the while-list in startup.conf Best Regards Avi > -Original Message- >