[vpp-dev] Understanding policer configuration

Hello all, I am trying to set up policing in VPP, using RESTCONF. The postman collections provided by hc2vpp gives the parameters and requests that needs to be made to configure policing. While configuring I do not understand what classifier table and classifier session is. classify table has a

Re: [vpp-dev] Using prefetch and buffer_enqueue

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 4:18 PM Damjan Marion wrote: >> On 9 Jan 2019, at 09:53, Raj wrote: >> 1. static_always_inline void >> vlib_buffer_enqueue_to_next (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t * node, >>u32 * buffers, u16 * nexts, uword count) >> > > This

Re: [vpp-dev] Question about #16465 patch

> On 9 Jan 2019, at 16:38, Alexander Chernavin wrote: > > Hello, > I have a question about this path: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16465/ > > > There was a comment about used terminology ("dev instance" vs "ID") that I > addressed but no further actions

[vpp-dev] VPP Release 19.01 F0 has arrived

Hello all, The API freeze day and time has come! [1] This means only low-risk changes are accepted on the main branch until it reopens again. I will send a separate announcement when that happens. --a [1] https://wiki.fd.io/view/Projects/vpp/Release_Plans/Release_Plan_19.01

[vpp-dev] Question about #16465 patch

Hello, I have a question about this path: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16465/ There was a comment about used terminology ("dev instance" vs "ID") that I addressed but no further actions after this. Can you clarify what would be needed to get the patch accepted? Thanks, Alexander

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] IPFIX Nat Logging

Hi, so you have checked: - trace (show trace) after enabling trace on the input node - show errors - interface counters Apart from firing up the debugger I’m running out of suggestions. Can you get plain (non-NAT) IPfix to work? Cheers, Ole > On 9 Jan 2019, at 14:04, emma sdi wrote: > >

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] IPFIX Nat Logging

Dear Fabian, I checked the output of "sh int" command and ipfix flush command didn't't change tx packets counters. it seems this command don't work! Anyway thanks for taking time and your consideration and help. Best Regards, On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 3:45 PM Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON

[vpp-dev] Coverity Scan Update

Follow-up from yesterday's project call... See https://community.synopsys.com/s/article/Coverity-Scan-Update Executive summary, extracted from the URL shown above: "On Monday, January 7, 2019 our team was notified that our Coverity Scan hosting service provider unexpectedly ceased operations,

Re: [vpp-dev] wwan0 intarface - vpp

+1, bridging the interface also enables direct use of wpa_supplicant to do the authentication dance. D. From: Jim Thompson Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 6:39 PM To: Dave Barach (dbarach) Cc: dmar...@me.com; amitmulay...@gmail.com; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] wwan0 intarface -

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 19.01 C API gets segmentation fault #binapi #vpp #vppcapi

NP, we’ve seen that one before, glad things are working properly now... D. From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Anthony Linz Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 1:15 AM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 19.01 C API gets segmentation fault #binapi #vpp #vppcapi Dear Dave, Thank

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] IPFIX Nat Logging

Hi, VPP configuration look good to me, I am not sure what is wrong. Maybe try to check “show interface” output, IPfix should add 9 additional tx packets for GigabitEthernet3/0/0 after ping and “ipfix flush” command. Matus From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of emma sdi Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] IPFIX Nat Logging

Dear Fabian, Unfortunately, the collector counter is still stuck to zero (no ipfix packets received). I would like to check my topology and configuration with you. thanks in advance. Client1 IP: 2.2.2.2 Client2 IP: 3.3.3.3 DUT config: GigabitEthernet3/0/0 (up):   L3 2.2.2.1/24

Re: [vpp-dev] Using prefetch and buffer_enqueue

> On 9 Jan 2019, at 09:53, Raj wrote: > > Hello all, > > While going through the VPP code, I have not fully understood what > the following functions mean and when should they be used? > > 1. static_always_inline void > vlib_buffer_enqueue_to_next (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t

Re: [vpp-dev] Performance Improvement

> On 9 Jan 2019, at 10:24, Gunaseelan Venkatachary - ERS, HCL Tech > wrote: > > Hello Team > Wish to reach out to bigger audience for some support in terms of performance > fine tuning, the context being , We are trying to insert a sample node, in > addition to whats already available in

[vpp-dev] Performance Improvement

Hello Team Wish to reach out to bigger audience for some support in terms of performance fine tuning, the context being , We are trying to insert a sample node, in addition to whats already available in VPP, both in RX and TX interfaces, using feature ARC ( like after device_input node in Rx) .

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] IPFIX Nat Logging

https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/NAT#Enable_NAT_plugin_IPFIX_logging_example You can also take a look at NAT plugin test https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=vpp.git;a=blob;f=test/test_nat.py;h=c64359a4db743ebf187c4198a12b2e3c80f5433d;hb=HEAD#l2646 Matus From: khers Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019

[vpp-dev] Using prefetch and buffer_enqueue

Hello all, While going through the VPP code, I have not fully understood what the following functions mean and when should they be used? 1. static_always_inline void vlib_buffer_enqueue_to_next (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t * node, u32 * buffers,

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] IPFIX Nat Logging

[Edited Message Follows] Dear Fabian, No. my collector doesn't receive any thing. I would appreciate if you could give me a valid config for ipfix logging. Warm Regards On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 9:16 AM Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) < matfa...@cisco.com > wrote: >

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] IPFIX Nat Logging

Dear Fabian, No. my collector don't receive any thing. I would appreciate if you could give me a valid config for ipfix logging. Warm Regards On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 9:16 AM Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > Hi, > > > > Do you receive at least IPfix templates

[vpp-dev] Mellanox ConnectX-4 Lx cards binding with DPDK, but not recognized by VPP #vpp

*Setup:* ·Platform – GNU/Linux ·Kernel – 4.4.0-131-generic ·Processor – x86_64 ·OS - Ubuntu 16.04   *MLNX_OFED Driver Version :* ·4.1-1.0.2.0 Followed link :