Re: [vpp-dev] the way of using sub-interface

Just like the regular interface you are using: create sub-interfaces eth0 181 set interface state eth0.181 up set interface ip address eth0.181 18.1.0.141/24 ip route add 0.0.0.0/0 via 18.1.0.1 eth0.181 Note there is some performance penalty using vlan sub-intf. As I can see on my setup, > 10%

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] IPFIX Nat Logging

Not at my computer right now, but since flow packets are locally generated there might not be trace information for them. Looks like 13 ipfix packets were sent though. You didn’t see those on the wire? Cheers Ole > On 14 Jan 2019, at 08:14, emma sdi wrote: > > Dear Ole, > > I checked

[vpp-dev] openssl 3.0.0

Hello, all I will use a new API added in openssl 3.0.0 master for a better async communication, but I found that some API in openssl 3.0.0 has deprecated, such as EC_POINT_get_affine_coordinates_GFp/EC_POINT_set_affine_coordinates_GFp. I added a patch to fix this problem to make VPP compatible

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] IPFIX Nat Logging

Dear Ole, I checked ipfix by flowprobe and I have the same problem again. I don't see any ipfix packets log in "vppctl sh trace".   vppctl sh error    Count    Node  Reason 14802    null-node   blackholed packets     13

[vpp-dev] the way of using sub-interface

Hi all, How can I use the sub-interface after creating ? #create sub-interfaces GigabitEthernet2/0/0 11 Does it means the VLAN ID ? I want to let GigabitEthernet2/0/0 && GigabitEthernet2/0/0 to be same VLAN (ID:11). How should I do? Thanks. wangchuan...@163.com -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[vpp-dev] VIRL jobs in CI gate

What do people think about changing the CI gate verify job to only run VIRL jobs for change-sets that touch the src/ folder?  It seems like the current process uses more resources than needed. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11904):