Hi,
I have a plugin node in which I want to process some received packets. When
a packet is destined to an IP address that is configured on a loopback
interface, I want to be able to lookup some data based on the sw_if_index
of the loopback interface. Packets that are sent to the loopback address
Heh, I was about to look at this for a “captive portal” like app.
(There is a silent ‘r’ in captive, but providers seem to love them.)
> On Jun 14, 2019, at 9:39 AM, Florin Coras wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> By default the stack only accepts “for-us” packets, i.e., packets that have
> as
Hi,
By default the stack only accepts “for-us” packets, i.e., packets that have as
destination ip one vpp’s interface ips. To support transparent proxying you’d
have to 1) write your own feature that intercepts traffic and delivers it to
the stack and 2) your own transparent proxy app.
It looks like you sent one ore more worker threads down a rabbit hole, to the
point where they never make it back to the worker thread dispatch loop.
Otherwise, the data collection would have stopped properly.
I don’t know of any recent or broken commits to the performance monitor plugin.
Hello,
Does vpp support transparent proxy mode for applications like tproxy in Linux?
Thanks.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13287): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13287
Mute This Topic:
Hi ,
I am trying to use the perfmon plugin for cpu-cycles event.
I am doing a continuous ping over a memif channel.
But, I am seeing that the command always return saying "Data Collection in
progress".
DBGvpp# set pmc cpu-cycles
Start collection for 1 events, wait 1.00 seconds
DEADMAN:
Hello Ken,
Currently VPP supports Encapsulation/Decapsulation only for L2TPv3 not L2TPv2
and that is also only for IPv6 not for IPv4. So, its not possible to validate
your gateway with VPP end point for L2TPv2/IPv4 based tunnel.
Thanks,
Prashant
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all
