Hi John & Everyone & Community,
In my scene, it is the demand to put multiple subnets in one BD. A few days
ago, I have found the other proper idea to implement the demand mentioned in
the mail subject and original mail.
This problem and mail can be close now.
Have a nice day, everybody!
Matt,
It was indeed that simple! I've been trying to figure this out for two
days and somehow missed that one little detail.
My wireguard interface is up and FRR is talking OSPF over it now!
Thanks!
-Landy
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:05 PM Matthew Smith via lists.fd.io
wrote:
>
> Hi Landy,
>
>
Hi Landy,
The packet you're receiving is probably not encrypted. You can see that
it was successfully decrypted after wg4-input because the trace shows the
inside addresses (192.168.42.7 -> 192.168.42.6). None of the nodes after
that point would have encrypted it again. The likely explanation is
I captured a trace of an incoming ping packet, and I have included it below.
This is a ping from 192.168.42.7 (remote wireguard peer, tunnel
address) to 192.168.42.6 ( local vpp host, tunnel address )
It appears everything is good all the way through the punt stage, but
for some reason the
VPP performs best when packets are batched together.
You should observe performance improvement with iperf multiflow test if there
are no other bottlenecks in your setup.
Best Regards,
Mohsin
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Xiaodong Xu
Date: Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:30 AM
To:
Hi all,
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37482
Feel free to push the updates in case you have any edits.
As a reminder - the release will commence at 12:00 UTC on Wednesday 26 October
(in just less than a week).
--a /* your friendly 22.10 release manager */
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You
HI VPP-dev team,
Can you please help here and let me know if anything is missing in config
Thanks,
Suresh
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#22055): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/22055
Mute This Topic:
