otiation: on*
> MDI-X: Unknown
>
>
>
>
>
> The supported ports seem mismatched at either end with AutoNeg disabled at
> one, I doubt the parameters are exchanged to get the transmissions going.
> Some expert in the ethernet might want to comment if this could be an
ven
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of "Chuan Han via Lists.Fd.Io"
>
> *Reply-To: *"chuan...@google.com"
> *Date: *Friday, October 18, 2019 at 4:05 PM
> *To: *Chuan Han
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 brid
>>> Supported ports: [ TP ]
>>>>>>>>>> Supported link modes: 100baseT/Full
>>>>>>>>>> 1000baseT/Full
>>>>>>>>>>
Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
>>>>>> Speed: 10000Mb/s
>>>>>> Duplex: Full
>>>>>> *Port: Twisted Pair*
>>>>>> PHYAD: 0
>>>>>> Transceiver: internal
>>>&g
;>>> Transceiver: internal
>>>>> *Auto-negotiation: on*
>>>>> MDI-X: Unknown
>>>>> Supports Wake-on: umbg
>>>>> Wake-on: g
>>>>> Current message level: 0x0007 (7)
>&g
;>>
>>>> not clear if this plays a role or not.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 2:41 PM Chuan Han via Lists.Fd.Io
>>>> <http://lists.fd.io/> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Restarting ixia controller does not help. We ende
>>> eth0 2 up 9000/0/0/0 rx
>>> packets 30925
>>> rx
>>> bytes 3680075
>>>
rts having '!'.
>>>>
>>>> We are not sure how ixia port plays a role here. eth0 interfaces are
>>>> the interfaces connecting two servers, not to ixia.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:26 AM Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv) <
>&
nkatraman (balajiv)
>> mailto:bala...@cisco.com>> wrote:
>> Hi Chuan,
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you please try to reset the ixia controller connected to port 4?
>>
>> I have seen issues with ‘!’ on ixia. Given the carrier on eth0 is down, I
>> suspec
t;>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:54 AM Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv) <
>>>> bala...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Chuan,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I assume u have unidirectional stre
gt;
>>> I have seen issues with ‘!’ on ixia. Given the carrier on eth0 is down,
>>> I suspect the ixia port.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Balaji.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>&g
>
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>"
mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, Arivudainambi Appachi
gounder mailto:aappa...@google.com>>, Jerry Cen
mailto:zhiw...@google.com>>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
Yes. It is unidire
October 17, 2019 at 2:41 PM
> *To: *"Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Arivudainambi Appachi
> gounder , Jerry Cen
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
>
> Restarting ixia controller does not help. We
e: Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 2:41 PM
> To: "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)" <mailto:bala...@cisco.com>>
> Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>" <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, Arivudainambi Appachi gounder
> mailto:aappa...@goog
alaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Arivudainambi Appachi
> gounder , Jerry Cen
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
>
>
>
> Restarting ixia controller does not help. We ended up with both ixia ports
> having
he ixia port.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Balaji.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Chuan Han
>> *Date: *Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 11:09 AM
>> *To: *"Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
>>
To: "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Arivudainambi Appachi gounder
, Jerry Cen
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
Restarting ixia controller does not help. We ended up with both ixia ports
having '!'.
We are not sure how ixia po
;
>
>
> *From: *Chuan Han
> *Date: *Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 11:09 AM
> *To: *"Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Arivudainambi Appachi
> gounder , Jerry Cen
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
lajiv)"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Arivudainambi Appachi gounder
, Jerry Cen
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
Yes. It is unidirectional stream from port 1 to port 4.
Another engineer, Nambi, configured ixia. What he showed me yesterday is that
xia port
1.2/24 should be seen on its other port. Are the ixia ports up at
> both ends?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Balaji.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of "Chuan Han via Lists.Fd.Io"
>
> *Reply-To: *"chuan...@google.com"
> *Da
;"
mailto:dmar...@me.com>>
Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 5:12 PM
To: "chuan...@google.com<mailto:chuan...@google.com>"
mailto:chuan...@google.com>>
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>"
mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>
Subj
On R230, we have the following. Not sure why eth0 is down. I used the same
setup for L3 routing measurement. Everything worked fine.
vpp# sh hardware-interfaces eth0
NameIdx Link Hardware
eth0 2down eth0
Link speed: unknown
> On 17 Oct 2019, at 09:59, Chuan Han wrote:
>
> It seems R740 vpp works fine. All packets coming from port 1 go to port 2.
>
> vpp# sh int
> Name IdxState MTU (L3/IP4/IP6/MPLS)
> Counter Count
> eth0 2 up
t;
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of "Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io"
>
> *Reply-To: *"dmar...@me.com"
> *Date: *Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 5:12 PM
> *To: *"chuan...@google.com"
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-de
16, 2019 at 5:12 PM
To: "chuan...@google.com"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
On 16 Oct 2019, at 16:14, Chuan Han via Lists.Fd.Io
mailto:chuanhan=google@lists.fd.io>> wrote:
Hi, vpp experts,
We are trying to ma
> On 16 Oct 2019, at 16:14, Chuan Han via Lists.Fd.Io
> wrote:
>
> Hi, vpp experts,
>
> We are trying to make basic l2 bridge works within vpp.
>
> We have two servers: r230 and r740, each of which has two phy nics. Two
> servers are connected via cable. On each server, we bring these two
Hi, vpp experts,
We are trying to make basic l2 bridge works within vpp.
We have two servers: r230 and r740, each of which has two phy nics. Two
servers are connected via cable. On each server, we bring these two nics
into the same vpp instance and put them into the same l2 bridge. We tried
27 matches
Mail list logo
