Re: [vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT rls1801 report published

Thanks Ray, and well spotted re regressions.. We were still collecting data on those, as they have been masked before by another issue related to VPP plugins (jira CSIT-925) that confused CSIT performance trending machinery, and it was unclear if it was CSIT environment or VPP code. We made

Re: [vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT rls1801 report published

w00t, much kudos, always hugely valuable. There are some pretty significant regression on both xl710 and x520 for vhost and ipsec use cases at the bottom of the table. The most of significant of these is a 42% drop in the performance of 10ge2p1x520-64b-1t1c-eth-l2xcbase-eth-2vhostvr1024-1vm

Re: [vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT rls1801 report published

WooHoo!  Congrats to the CSIT community. -daw- On 02/19/2018 12:06 PM, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) wrote: Dear FD.io community, *The CSIT rls1801 report is now published on FD.io docs site:* *html: *https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1801/report/ *pdf:*

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT rls1801 report published

Dear FD.io community, The CSIT rls1801 report is now published on FD.io docs site: html: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1801/report/ pdf: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1801/report/_static/archive/csit_rls1801.pdf Many Thanks to All CSIT Contributors and Committers