Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors

flirble.org>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors Thanks Neale; merged. Hopefully normal service will be resumed on this afternoons run! :) Chris. > -Original Message-

Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors

Chris Luke <chr...@flirble.org>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors > > Hi Chris, > > And this one for VOM: > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9374/ > > /neale > > -Original Message- > From: <vpp-d

Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors

rg>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors Hi Chris, I just pushed: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9370/ to fix the use of integer types in BIER. I’ll look at the VOM ones too.

Re: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors

017 at 22:05 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: [vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors FYI, Coverity has just failed to build because of issues in BIER (and maybe VOM); some of these may have existed a while, because these all seem to be

[vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors

FYI, Coverity has just failed to build because of issues in BIER (and maybe VOM); some of these may have existed a while, because these all seem to be warnings and Coverity fails a build based on number of rejected build units exceeding a % threshold. Likely BIER was merged and triggered the

[vpp-dev] FW: Coverity build failed with 18 errors

Doh. Repost. I sent the original from the wrong account.  (mods, pls ignore the one held for moderation!) -Original Message- From: Chris Luke [mailto:chr...@flirble.org] Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 16:06 To: 'vpp-dev@lists.fd.io' Subject: FW: Coverity build