Re: Handoff design issues [Re: RES: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops?]

2020-11-16 Thread Christian Hopps
Thanks >>> >>> Marcos >>> >>> -Mensagem original- >>> De: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Em nome de ksekera via [] >>> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 13 de novembro de 2020 14:02 >>> Para: Marcos - Mgiga >>> Cc: Elias Rudberg ; vpp-dev

Re: Handoff design issues [Re: RES: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops?]

2020-11-16 Thread Klement Sekera via lists.fd.io
tes ? Is there some specific command or log ? >> >> Thanks >> >> Marcos >> >> -Mensagem original- >> De: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Em nome de ksekera via [] >> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 13 de novembro de 2020 14:02 >> Para: Marcos

Re: RES: RES: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops?

2020-11-16 Thread Klement Sekera via lists.fd.io
xta-feira, 13 de novembro de 2020 14:26 > Para: Marcos - Mgiga > Cc: Elias Rudberg ; vpp-dev > Assunto: Re: RES: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue > size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops? > > I used the usual > > 1. start traffic > 2

Re: Handoff design issues [Re: RES: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops?]

2020-11-13 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
nks > > > > Marcos > > > > -Mensagem original- > > De: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Em nome de ksekera via > > [] Enviada em: sexta-feira, 13 de novembro de 2020 14:02 > > Para: Marcos - Mgiga > > Cc: Elias Rudberg ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > As

Handoff design issues [Re: RES: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops?]

2020-11-13 Thread Christian Hopps
02 > Para: Marcos - Mgiga > Cc: Elias Rudberg ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Assunto: Re: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size > NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops? > > Not completely idle, more like medium load. Vector rates at which I saw > congestion d

RES: RES: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops?

2020-11-13 Thread Marcos - Mgiga
novembro de 2020 14:26 Para: Marcos - Mgiga Cc: Elias Rudberg ; vpp-dev Assunto: Re: RES: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops? I used the usual 1. start traffic 2. clear run 3. wait n seconds (e.g. n == 10) 4. show run Klement

Re: RES: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops?

2020-11-13 Thread Klement Sekera via lists.fd.io
mmand or log ? > > Thanks > > Marcos > > -Mensagem original- > De: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Em nome de ksekera via [] > Enviada em: sexta-feira, 13 de novembro de 2020 14:02 > Para: Marcos - Mgiga > Cc: Elias Rudberg ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Assunto: Re: RES: [vpp-dev] I

RES: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops?

2020-11-13 Thread Marcos - Mgiga
Cc: Elias Rudberg ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Assunto: Re: RES: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops? Not completely idle, more like medium load. Vector rates at which I saw congestion drops were roughly 40 for thread doing no work (just