03/12/2019 00:26, Damjan Marion:
>
> Hi THomas!
>
> Inline...
>
> > On 2 Dec 2019, at 23:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > VPP has a buffer called vlib_buffer_t, while DPDK has rte_mbuf.
> > Are there some benchmarks about the cost of converting, from one format
> > to the ot
>
> On 3 Dec 2019, at 09:28, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 03/12/2019 00:26, Damjan Marion:
>>
>> Hi THomas!
>>
>> Inline...
>>
On 2 Dec 2019, at 23:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> VPP has a buffer called vlib_buffer_t, while DPDK has rte_mbuf.
>>> Are there some be
Hi Benoit,
Do you have access to FD.io lab? The Taishan servers are in it.
Juraj
-Original Message-
From: Benoit Ganne (bganne)
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 4:03 PM
To: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) ;
Juraj Linkeš ; Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
; vpp-de
Latest update is that Benoit has no access over VPN so he did try to replicate
in local lab (assuming x86).
I will do quick fix in CSIT. I will disable MLX driver on Taishan.
Peter Mikus
Engineer - Software
Cisco Systems Limited
> -Original Message-
> From: Juraj Linkeš
> Sent: Tuesday,
*What:*
* Jenkins
o OS and security updates
o Upgrade to 2.190.3
o Plugin updates
* Nexus
o OS updates
* Jira
o OS updates
* Gerrit
o OS updates
* Sonar
o OS updates
* OpenGrok
o OS updates
*When: *2019-12-10 1900 UTC to 2200 UTC
*Impa
03/12/2019 13:12, Damjan Marion:
> > On 3 Dec 2019, at 09:28, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 03/12/2019 00:26, Damjan Marion:
> >>
> >> Hi THomas!
> >>
> >> Inline...
> >>
> On 2 Dec 2019, at 23:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> VPP has a buffer called vlib_buffer_
Hello Team,
During integration of our software with VPP 19.08 we have found that ipv6
neighbor does not get discovered on first sw_if_index on which ipv6 is
enabled.
On further analysis we found that, it is due to radv_info->mcast_adj_index
being checked against "0" in the following code :-
Func
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:09 AM Rajith PR wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> During integration of our software with VPP 19.08 we have found that ipv6
> neighbor does not get discovered on first sw_if_index on which ipv6 is
> enabled.
>
Do you have a small test case available?
> Based on our understandi
> On 3 Dec 2019, at 17:06, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 03/12/2019 13:12, Damjan Marion:
>>> On 3 Dec 2019, at 09:28, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 03/12/2019 00:26, Damjan Marion:
Hi THomas!
Inline...
>> On 2 Dec 2019, at 23:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
>
> On 3 Dec 2019, at 17:06, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 03/12/2019 13:12, Damjan Marion:
>>> On 3 Dec 2019, at 09:28, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 03/12/2019 00:26, Damjan Marion:
Hi THomas!
Inline...
>> On 2 Dec 2019, at 23:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
>
Hi all,
I've been running some performance tests and not quite getting the results I
was hoping for, and have a couple of related questions I was hoping someone
could provide some tips with. For context, here's a summary of the results of
TCP tests I've run on two VMs (CentOS 7 OpenStack instan
Interesting discussion.
> Yes it is possible to use DPDK in VPP with degraded performance.
> If an user wants best performance with VPP and a real NIC,
> a new driver must be implemented for VPP only.
>
> Anyway real performance benefits are in hardware device offloads
> which will be hard to imp
Thomas,
I am afraid you may be missing the point. VPP is a framework where plugins are
first class citizens. If a plugin requires leveraging offload (inline or
lookaside), it is more than welcome to do it.
There are multiple examples including hw crypto accelerators
(https://software.intel.com/e
> On Dec 3, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
>
> If you don't want that, wouldn't you just build something with a Trident 4?
> ;-)
Or Tofino, if you want to go that direction. Even then, the amount of
packet-processing (especially the edge/exception conditions) can overwhelm a
hardware-b
Looks right, Neale thinks it looks right.
Simple question: who’s going to push the patch? I’ll do it if nobody else wants
to...
Thanks... Dave
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Jon Loeliger via
Lists.Fd.Io
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 12:50 PM
To: Rajith PR
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Su
Hi Dom,
I’ve never tried to run the stack in a VM, so not sure about the expected
performance, but here are a couple of comments:
- What fifo sizes are you using? Are they at least 4MB (see [1] for VCL
configuration).
- I don’t think you need to configure more than 16k buffers/numa.
Addition
> Looks right, Neale thinks it looks right.
>
> Simple question: who’s going to push the patch? I’ll do it if nobody else
> wants to...
Button pressed.
Best regards,
Ole
>
> Thanks... Dave
>
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Jon Loeliger via
> Lists.Fd.Io
> Sent: Tuesday, Decemb
17 matches
Mail list logo
