Re: [vpp-dev] event-logger output format

Do you think it would be prudent to publish a ‘warning’ message on its impact on packet forwarding when this cmd is used? Thanks! -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of Aleksander Djuric Date: Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 8:07 AM To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev]

Re: [vpp-dev] event-logger output format

vlib_worker_thread_barrier_release (vm); What do people think? Thanks... Dave From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Balaji Venkatraman via Lists.Fd.Io Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 12:21 PM To: Aleksander Djuric ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] event-logg

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [vpp-dev] How to add plugin in running VPP ?

Instead of being excessively invasive to achieve HA, as Ole suggests, might be easier to spin off another instance based on some critical parameters. A kubernetes-like external agent that can be user configured to save the last config and reload the instances with the new plugin, or even

Re: [vpp-dev] make test - Python3 update

Hi Ole, Appreciate all the efforts! Any reason why we shouldn’t make PYTHON=python3.6 the default option? That way, we would enforce development here on is 3.6 compliant. Thanks much! — Regards, Balaji. On Oct 22, 2019, at 1:56 AM, Ole Troan wrote:  All, You might have seen the raft of

Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work

+-+ | | | | | IXIA

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP IPSec failed to add SA

I think the vpp-plugin-core, vpp-plugin-dpdk should carry them: sudo apt-get install vpp-plugin-core vpp-plugin-dpdk and confirm the crypto engine is loaded : show plugins -- Regards, Balaji. From: "Ying, Ruoyu" Date: Friday, October 18, 2019 at 8:43 AM To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "Filip

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP IPSec failed to add SA

Perhaps this doc might be useful.. https://docs.fd.io/vpp/19.04/dpdk_crypto_ipsec_doc.html -- Regards, Balaji. From: "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)" Date: Friday, October 18, 2019 at 8:58 AM To: "Ying, Ruoyu" , "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "Filip Tehlar -X (ftehlar - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP IPSec failed to add SA

Looking at the docs, I think you need to set one using the: set crypto handler cipher [cipher2 cipher3 …] engine Not sure, what’s the default behavior. -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of "Ying, Ruoyu" Date: Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 6:03 PM To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" ,

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP IPSec failed to add SA

Hi Ruoyu, Could you please post the ipsec error message on create? SA create usually indicates an issue with hardware. You might want to try if rebooting the instance resolves it? -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of "Ying, Ruoyu" Date: Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 1:51 AM To:

Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work

Hi Chuan, Could you please try to reset the ixia controller connected to port 4? I have seen issues with ‘!’ on ixia. Given the carrier on eth0 is down, I suspect the ixia port. -- Regards, Balaji. From: Chuan Han Date: Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 11:09 AM To: "Balaji Venkatraman

Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work

Hi Chuan, I assume u have unidirectional stream ? ixia->1->2->3->4->ixia? vpp# sh int Name IdxState MTU (L3/IP4/IP6/MPLS) Counter Count eth0 2 up 9000/0/0/0 rx packets 30925

Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work

Hi Chuan, I got the eth0 and eth1 mixed up. My bad. Are these fiber or copper links? You may want to check if the cable is ok. Also, please make sure you have crossover cable(if RJ) between the servers. Thanks! -- Regards, Balaji. From: Chuan Han Date: Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 2:41 PM

Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work

It plays a role if it is asymmetric at both ends. You could enable it at both ends and check. On Oct 17, 2019, at 3:15 PM, Chuan Han wrote:  I rebooted the r230 machine and found the phy nic corresponding to eth has autoneg off. root@esdn-relay:~/gnxi/perf_testing/r230# ethtool enp6s0f1

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP with FRR Bring-up - Netlink and Router Plugin build failures

[Sorry hit the ‘send’ by mistake..] Did you try that solution? Thanks! -- Regards, Balaji. From: "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)" Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 4:46 PM To: "Majumdar, Kausik" , vpp-dev Cc: "vppsb-...@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP with FRR Bring-up - Netlink

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP with FRR Bring-up - Netlink and Router Plugin build failures

Hi Kausik, I see a project that incorporated FRR with VPP. x https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/wiki/Alternate-forwarding-planes:-VPP -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of "Majumdar, Kausik" Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 4:31 PM To: vpp-dev Cc: "vppsb-...@lists.fd.io" ,

Re: [vpp-dev] interface activation problem using VPP in Azure with DPDK failsafe interfaces #vpp #dpdk #azure

cc-Damjan who is the DPDK expert. Not very conversant with failsafeEth. Looks like the driver isn’t able to connect to the device 2020/01/23 14:37:40:578 notice dpdk EAL: Driver cannot attach the device (0003:00:02.0) Here is some info I looked up regarding initializing the DPDK

Re: [vpp-dev] issue with ARP and classify packet forwarding #classify

Hi Po, Could you ensure the memifs and the ACLs u have configured are consistent with the tables you have. Are all under 100? -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of Po Date: Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 11:14 PM To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [vpp-dev] issue with ARP and classify

Re: [vpp-dev] interface activation problem using VPP in Azure with DPDK failsafe interfaces #vpp #dpdk #azure

Hi Chris, We see ‘carrier down’ on the FailsafeEthernet0. What is the remote end to this interface? Could you confirm that is up as well? vpp# show hardware NameIdx Link Hardware FailsafeEthernet0 1down FailsafeEthernet0 Link speed: 10

Re: [vpp-dev] routing configuration other than default

Hi Sothy, I think you need to have a default route defined in table 1. ip route add 0.0.0.0/0 table 1 via 172.30.1.2 host-vpp1eth1 could u try that? -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of sothy Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 9:47 AM To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject:

Re: [vpp-dev] Check in ip4_local_inline()

Hi Nitin, Isn’t ip_lookup based of destination ip, Could you verify if the lookup happens on every packet when ‘destination ip’ is the same? -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of "Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io" Reply-To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" Date: Friday, January 3, 2020 at 6:38 AM To:

Re: [vpp-dev] Discrepancies between CI jobs and s5ci

I agree with Damjan on this. Seems convoluted to comprehend and enhance the suite. I think, it isn’t very intuitive. But I guess we are tied to python to interface with the tools (scapy, trex, blah for traffic profiles)? -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of "Damjan Marion via

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP - DPDK - No ARP learning on VPP and no ARP reply sent.

As Neale replied earlier, adding L3 addr to the interface should implicitly enable arp on it. Thanks! -- Regards, Balaji. From: Mrityunjay Kumar Date: Friday, May 15, 2020 at 7:19 AM To: "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)" Cc: Laurent Dumont , vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP - DPDK - No ARP

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP - DPDK - No ARP learning on VPP and no ARP reply sent.

Hi Mrityunjay, Could you try adding an ip route and recheck. I think ARP is enabled once ip routing is enabled. Thanks -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of Laurent Dumont Date: Friday, May 15, 2020 at 4:57 AM To: Mrityunjay Kumar Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP - DPDK - No ARP

Re: (Q about fixing endianness bugs in handlers) Re: [vpp-dev] Proposal for VPP binary API stability

Hi Andrew, “ An API that is not touched during a "make test" can not be moved beyond the "in-progress" status. Adding the unit test implies the commitment from the API contributor to follow the option (5) above even for "trivial endianness bugs". “ Absolutely essential! More so, after a

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP - DPDK - No ARP learning on VPP and no ARP reply sent.

Hi Laurent, Trying to understand your setup: Do you have : 100.100.101.x/24 TOR[.1] <>[.2] VLAN So, is the interface on TOR end also on a vlan (with same id)? -- Regards, Balaji. From: Laurent Dumont Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 at 4:58 PM To: "Balaji

Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface

Hi Venkat, Underlying the ABF is another ACL. When we attach an ABF to the interface, the ACL it inherits gets applied to the interface. Not sure if another ACL independent of the above can be attached to the same interface. But, in any case, it should not crash  Thanks! -- Regards, Balaji.

Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface

are matching against different criteria. Re the debug CLI, it's often not robust to garbage input. If the API has the same problem though, I'll fix it. Neale tpyed by my fat tumhbs From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Balaji Venkatraman via lists.fd.io Sent: Tuesd

Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface

nctions, especially when they are matching against different criteria. Re the debug CLI, it's often not robust to garbage input. If the API has the same problem though, I'll fix it. Neale tpyed by my fat tumhbs ________ From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Balaji Ve

Re: [vpp-dev] VRRP issue

Hi Naveen, Could you try a shut/no shut on the vlan segment between the VRs? Sometimes unreliable communication between the switches can cause the hellos to not be seen at other end.. Interface counters on the interface in question should help Thanks! -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of

Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface

gure an ABF on the interface that already has an non-abf ACL attached to the interface. And when I don't have non-abf ACL, then I am able to install ABF rule. Hence was wondering if it's a misconfiguration to have both ABF and non-abf ACL on the same interface. I agree, in any case, it should n

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP API CRC compatibility check process in checkstyle merged and active

Hi Andrew, Just a few comments regarding coverage. We could use the coverage (we currently run on a weekly basis) as baseline and monitor for incremental increases when a versioning change occurs. If there was a way to check the UT for the _v2 covers the ‘new/modified’ code and if possible

Re: [vpp-dev] Dynamically adding a node between two nodes

-- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of Prashanth Fernando Date: Monday, June 8, 2020 at 10:17 PM To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [vpp-dev] Dynamically adding a node between two nodes Hi, I am pretty new to VPP and trying to understand few things * Can I add a node in middle of a

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP forwarding packets not destined to it #vpp

Hi Nagaraju, Perhaps you need to disable it on the interface in question? Seems like it is enabled by default. Thanks! -- Balaji set bridge-domain flood Summary/usage set bridge-domain flood [disable]. Description Layer 2 flooding can be enabled and disabled on each interface and on each

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP forwarding packets not destined to it #vpp

Hi John, I assume the pass thru/drop applies to multicast frames too(assuming we have IGMP enabled segment). Correct? Thanks! -- Regards, Balaji. From: on behalf of "John Lo (loj) via lists.fd.io" Reply-To: "John Lo (loj)" Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 at 1:38 PM To: Nagaraju Vemuri Cc:

Re: [vpp-dev] Crash in ACL code while applying rulematch

Hi Satya, Inline.. From: on behalf of Satya Murthy Date: Friday, July 17, 2020 at 3:58 AM To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Crash in ACL code while applying rulematch Hi Andrew, We could not try the same test with the change you suggested. We will try it for sure in this

Re: [vpp-dev] Crash in ACL code while applying rulematch

Hi Satya, Rule-matching of ACL is in the data path while add/del is in control plane. If you NOT hitting the crash with lock in datapath, it implies the crash is happening during rule-matching after perhaps a delete operation of an ACE..? Just a possible scenario… Thanks! -- Regards, Balaji.