Hi,
It is an error on DPDK side.
It seems the tarball for DPDK 17.08 has been overwritten by the stable release
process.
I have restored the original tarball and we are checking what went wrong.
fast.dpdk.org is a CDN for static.dpdk.org.
It may take time to get the restored tarball on all CDN n
2016-11-28 16:28, Maxime Coquelin:
> On 11/24/2016 04:24 PM, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> > DPDK v16.04 added support for vHost User TSO; as such, by default,
> > TSO is advertised to guest devices as an available feature during
> > feature negotiation with QEMU.
> > However, while the vHost user back
Hi all,
VPP has a buffer called vlib_buffer_t, while DPDK has rte_mbuf.
Are there some benchmarks about the cost of converting, from one format
to the other one, during Rx/Tx operations?
I'm sure there would be some benefits of switching VPP to natively use
the DPDK mbuf allocated in mempools.
Wh
03/12/2019 00:26, Damjan Marion:
>
> Hi THomas!
>
> Inline...
>
> > On 2 Dec 2019, at 23:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > VPP has a buffer called vlib_buffer_t, while DPDK has rte_mbuf.
> > Are there some benchmarks about
03/12/2019 13:12, Damjan Marion:
> > On 3 Dec 2019, at 09:28, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 03/12/2019 00:26, Damjan Marion:
> >>
> >> Hi THomas!
> >>
> >> Inline...
> >>
> >>>> On 2 Dec 2019, at 23:35, Thomas Mo
03/12/2019 20:01, Damjan Marion:
> On 3 Dec 2019, at 17:06, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 03/12/2019 13:12, Damjan Marion:
> >> On 3 Dec 2019, at 09:28, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 03/12/2019 00:26, Damjan Marion:
> >>>> On 2 Dec 2019, at 23:35, Th
03/12/2019 20:56, Ole Troan:
> Interesting discussion.
>
> > Yes it is possible to use DPDK in VPP with degraded performance.
> > If an user wants best performance with VPP and a real NIC,
> > a new driver must be implemented for VPP only.
> >
> > Anyway real performance benefits are in hardware
04/12/2019 15:25, Ole Troan:
> Thomas,
>
> > 2/ it confirms the VPP design choice of not being DPDK-dependent (at a
> > performance cost)
>
> Do you have any examples/features where a DPDK/offload solution would be
> performing better than VPP?
> Any numbers?
No sorry, I am not benchmarking VP
y efficient enough, great:
it means there is no need for bringing effort in native VPP drivers.
> Le 03/12/2019 17:07, « vpp-dev@lists.fd.io au nom de Thomas Monjalon »
> a écrit :
>
> 03/12/2019 13:12, Damjan Marion:
> > > On 3 Dec 2019, at 09:28, Thomas Monj
gt; Le 04/12/2019 15:19, « vpp-dev@lists.fd.io au nom de Thomas Monjalon »
> a écrit :
>
> 03/12/2019 20:01, Damjan Marion:
> > On 3 Dec 2019, at 17:06, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 03/12/2019 13:12, Damjan Marion:
> > >> On 3 Dec 2019, at 09
The comittee for SDN devroom at FOSDEM is pleased to announce
the schedule is available.
Three talks related to VPP are accepted:
- Rethinking kubernetes networking with SRv6 and Contiv-VPP
https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/event/rethinking_kubernetes_networking_with_srv6/
- Fast QUIC sockets for
11 matches
Mail list logo
