muthuraj.muth...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday 15 May 2020 at 09:20
> *To: *"Neale Ranns (nranns)"
> *Cc: *"Filip Tehlar -X (ftehlar - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)" <
> fteh...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
> *Subject: *Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM]
*"Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "Filip Tehlar -X
> (ftehlar - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)" , "
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
> *Subject: *Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Troubleshooting IPsec peer
> behind NAT (AWS instance)
>
>
>
> Hi Neale,
>
>
looking into this, once again.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Muthu
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 2:54 PM Neale Ranns (nranns)
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Muthu,
>>
>>
>>
>> I tried your 4over6 config, it doesn’t work… here’s the fix:
>>
>
*"Filip Tehlar -X (ftehlar - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)" <
> fteh...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
> *Subject: *Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Troubleshooting IPsec peer
> behind NAT (AWS instance)
>
>
>
> Hi Neale,
>
>
>
> Thank you
; /neale
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of Muthu Raj <
> muthuraj.muth...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday 11 May 2020 at 19:22
> *To: *"Neale Ranns (nranns)"
> *Cc: *"Filip Tehlar -X (ftehlar - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)" <
> fteh...@cisco.com>, "v
h...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
> *Subject: *Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Troubleshooting IPsec peer
> behind NAT (AWS instance)
>
>
>
> Hi Neale,
>
>
>
> The 10.6.0.0/16 is actually on the remote side, and should flow over the
> I
9
> *To: *"Filip Tehlar -X (ftehlar - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)" <
> fteh...@cisco.com>
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
> *Subject: *Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Troubleshooting IPsec peer
> behind NAT (AWS instance)
>
>
>
> Hi Filip,
>
>
>
&
y interface?
>
> Your help is much appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Muthu
>
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 7:11 PM Filip Tehlar -X (ftehlar - PANTHEON TECH
> SRO at Cisco) wrote:
>
> Hi Muthu,
>
> I don't see any reason why your approach shouldn't work.
>
> Do you have a
: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Troubleshooting IPsec peer behind NAT
(AWS instance)
Hello Filip,
I was wondering if IPv6 IPsec can help us here while NAT traversal is
being developed.
Can we route IPv4 traffic over ipv6 ipsec tunnel?
If we had two interfaces, one with the IPv4 IP which is part
