otiation: on*
> MDI-X: Unknown
>
>
>
>
>
> The supported ports seem mismatched at either end with AutoNeg disabled at
> one, I doubt the parameters are exchanged to get the transmissions going.
> Some expert in the ethernet might want to comment if this could be an
ven
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of "Chuan Han via Lists.Fd.Io"
>
> *Reply-To: *"chuan...@google.com"
> *Date: *Friday, October 18, 2019 at 4:05 PM
> *To: *Chuan Han
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 brid
>>> Supported ports: [ TP ]
>>>>>>>>>> Supported link modes: 100baseT/Full
>>>>>>>>>> 1000baseT/Full
>>>>>>>>>>
Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
>>>>>> Speed: 10000Mb/s
>>>>>> Duplex: Full
>>>>>> *Port: Twisted Pair*
>>>>>> PHYAD: 0
>>>>>> Transceiver: internal
>>>&g
;>>> Transceiver: internal
>>>>> *Auto-negotiation: on*
>>>>> MDI-X: Unknown
>>>>> Supports Wake-on: umbg
>>>>> Wake-on: g
>>>>> Current message level: 0x0007 (7)
>&g
;>>
>>>> not clear if this plays a role or not.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 2:41 PM Chuan Han via Lists.Fd.Io
>>>> <http://lists.fd.io/> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Restarting ixia controller does not help. We ende
>>> eth0 2 up 9000/0/0/0 rx
>>> packets 30925
>>> rx
>>> bytes 3680075
>>>
rts having '!'.
>>>>
>>>> We are not sure how ixia port plays a role here. eth0 interfaces are
>>>> the interfaces connecting two servers, not to ixia.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:26 AM Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv) <
>&
nkatraman (balajiv)
>> mailto:bala...@cisco.com>> wrote:
>> Hi Chuan,
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you please try to reset the ixia controller connected to port 4?
>>
>> I have seen issues with ‘!’ on ixia. Given the carrier on eth0 is down, I
>> suspec
t;>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:54 AM Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv) <
>>>> bala...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Chuan,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I assume u have unidirectional stre
gt;
>>> I have seen issues with ‘!’ on ixia. Given the carrier on eth0 is down,
>>> I suspect the ixia port.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Balaji.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>&g
>
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>"
mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, Arivudainambi Appachi
gounder mailto:aappa...@google.com>>, Jerry Cen
mailto:zhiw...@google.com>>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
Yes. It is unidire
October 17, 2019 at 2:41 PM
> *To: *"Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Arivudainambi Appachi
> gounder , Jerry Cen
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
>
> Restarting ixia controller does not help. We
e: Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 2:41 PM
> To: "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)" <mailto:bala...@cisco.com>>
> Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>" <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, Arivudainambi Appachi gounder
> mailto:aappa...@goog
alaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Arivudainambi Appachi
> gounder , Jerry Cen
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
>
>
>
> Restarting ixia controller does not help. We ended up with both ixia ports
> having
he ixia port.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Balaji.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Chuan Han
>> *Date: *Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 11:09 AM
>> *To: *"Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
>>
To: "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Arivudainambi Appachi gounder
, Jerry Cen
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
Restarting ixia controller does not help. We ended up with both ixia ports
having '!'.
We are not sure how ixia po
;
>
>
> *From: *Chuan Han
> *Date: *Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 11:09 AM
> *To: *"Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Arivudainambi Appachi
> gounder , Jerry Cen
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
lajiv)"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Arivudainambi Appachi gounder
, Jerry Cen
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
Yes. It is unidirectional stream from port 1 to port 4.
Another engineer, Nambi, configured ixia. What he showed me yesterday is that
xia port
1.2/24 should be seen on its other port. Are the ixia ports up at
> both ends?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Balaji.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of "Chuan Han via Lists.Fd.Io"
>
> *Reply-To: *"chuan...@google.com"
> *Da
;"
mailto:dmar...@me.com>>
Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 5:12 PM
To: "chuan...@google.com<mailto:chuan...@google.com>"
mailto:chuan...@google.com>>
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>"
mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>
Subj
On R230, we have the following. Not sure why eth0 is down. I used the same
setup for L3 routing measurement. Everything worked fine.
vpp# sh hardware-interfaces eth0
NameIdx Link Hardware
eth0 2down eth0
Link speed: unknown
> On 17 Oct 2019, at 09:59, Chuan Han wrote:
>
> It seems R740 vpp works fine. All packets coming from port 1 go to port 2.
>
> vpp# sh int
> Name IdxState MTU (L3/IP4/IP6/MPLS)
> Counter Count
> eth0 2 up
t;
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of "Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io"
>
> *Reply-To: *"dmar...@me.com"
> *Date: *Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 5:12 PM
> *To: *"chuan...@google.com"
> *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-de
16, 2019 at 5:12 PM
To: "chuan...@google.com"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Basic l2 bridging does not work
On 16 Oct 2019, at 16:14, Chuan Han via Lists.Fd.Io
mailto:chuanhan=google@lists.fd.io>> wrote:
Hi, vpp experts,
We are trying to ma
> On 16 Oct 2019, at 16:14, Chuan Han via Lists.Fd.Io
> wrote:
>
> Hi, vpp experts,
>
> We are trying to make basic l2 bridge works within vpp.
>
> We have two servers: r230 and r740, each of which has two phy nics. Two
> servers are connected via cable. On each server, we bring these two
26 matches
Mail list logo
