RE: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail.

Hi > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:36:38AM +0200, ?? wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:25:52 +0200 > > Alex Lyashkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Try "CPU CAP". > > > > Where could I read mode about this ? > > had a look at the patch, doesn't seem to complicated > so if you voluntee

Re: [Vserver] Error compiling util-vserver 0.29.2

Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This seems to compile ok! However, there are some ANSI warnings at the > beginning. Just ignore them... util-vserver is C99 (and compiles without warnings there). Pre-C99 compilers might give some warnings but they should compile it. Enrico ___

Re: [Vserver] Error compiling util-vserver 0.29.2

This seems to compile ok! However, there are some ANSI warnings at the beginning. I am attaching my configure output and the compile output for your information. Micah On Thu, 04 Mar 2004, Enrico Scholz wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Micah Anderson) writes: > > > I get the following error when I t

Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail.

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 17:44:58 +0100 Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:36:38AM +0200, ?? wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:25:52 +0200 > > Alex Lyashkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Try "CPU CAP". > > > > Where could I read mode about this ? > > ha

Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail.

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:36:38AM +0200, ?? wrote: > On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:25:52 +0200 > Alex Lyashkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Try "CPU CAP". > > Where could I read mode about this ? had a look at the patch, doesn't seem to complicated so if you volunteer to test it, I could add

Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail.

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 05:57:18PM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote: > ? ???, 04.03.2004, ? 11:36, ?? ?: > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:25:52 +0200 > > Alex Lyashkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Try "CPU CAP". > > > > Where could I read mode about this ? > > ___

Re: [Vserver] Re: Vserver & O(1)

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 01:50:50PM +0200, ?? wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:23:49 +1300 > Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 22:39, ?? wrote; > > > > > One year ago you made a ptah for vserver to use O(1) sheduled > > > (http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/

Re: [Vserver] VServer, heartbeat and drbd

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 10:57:40AM +0100, loic d'Anterroches wrote: > Hi, > > > Yes, you are right: heartbeat doesn't need to manage the ip takeover, > > vserver does. We emit an unsolitcited arp reply in the vserver pre-start > > script in order to inform all hosts in the local subnet about the >

Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail.

В Чтв, 04.03.2004, в 11:36, Богдан пишет: > On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:25:52 +0200 > Alex Lyashkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Try "CPU CAP". > > Where could I read mode about this ? > ___ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux

Re: [Vserver] Re: Vserver & O(1)

> Hm... but .2.4.24 has mremap hole - is there any workaround? patch the hole. -- Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9 We're giving you a new chance in life, and an opportunity to screw it up in a new, original way. ___

Re: [Vserver] Re: Vserver & O(1)

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:23:49 +1300 Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 22:39, Богдан wrote; > > > One year ago you made a ptah for vserver to use O(1) sheduled > > (http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200302/0155.html) - > > didn't you have same patch for 2.4.

[Vserver] Re: Vserver & O(1)

On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 22:39, ÐÐ wrote; > One year ago you made a ptah for vserver to use O(1) sheduled > (http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200302/0155.html) - > didn't you have same patch for 2.4.25 and O(1) patch, possible > form lck patchset ? That patchmonster Herbert has

Re: [Vserver] VServer, heartbeat and drbd

Hi, > Yes, you are right: heartbeat doesn't need to manage the ip takeover, > vserver does. We emit an unsolitcited arp reply in the vserver pre-start > script in order to inform all hosts in the local subnet about the > takeover. > We don't run the rebootmgr because we noticed that its open socke

Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail.

On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:25:52 +0200 Alex Lyashkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try "CPU CAP". Where could I read mode about this ? ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

[Vserver] O(1) sheduler && vserver - did someone have that working on 2.4 ?

Or I must use 2.6 only? Alex Lyashkov implemented it for RH kernel tree, does anyone have patch for vserver againr vanilla kernel and O(1) patch (possible from lck patchset) ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailm

Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail.

В Чтв, 04.03.2004, в 11:13, Богдан пишет: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:35:53 +0100 > Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 1'st - it was not a fork bomb. I expected that -t 5 will give to vserver > > > no mo then 10% of CPU time > > Why would '-t 5' limit cpu usage to 10%? What patches

Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail.

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:35:53 +0100 Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1'st - it was not a fork bomb. I expected that -t 5 will give to vserver > > no mo then 10% of CPU time > Why would '-t 5' limit cpu usage to 10%? What patches are you using for > that? Hi. None. It was my mistak

Re: [Vserver] VServer, heartbeat and drbd

On Wednesday 03 March 2004 16:51, loic d'Anterroches wrote: Hi, > Do I am wrong or thanks to the vserver approach I don't need to setup an > ip takeover? Or formulated another way: heartbeat is only used to start > the vserver on BB if BA goes down, drbd taking care of the synchro of the > data.