Re: [Vserver] grsecurity ending

2004-06-10 Thread Sandino Araico Sánchez
Herbert Poetzl wrote: The current vserver+grsecurity is working perfectly well for me on my systems. I've been using Sandino Araico Sanchez's vserver+grsec patch and they've been stable as a rock. as far as I know, a 'working' vserver/grsec combo was done several times, but not seriously

Re: [Vserver] grsecurity ending

2004-06-10 Thread Sandino Araico Sánchez
Dariush Pietrzak wrote: The current vserver+grsecurity is working perfectly well for me on my systems. I've been using Sandino Araico Sanchez's vserver+grsec patch and they've been stable as a rock. That's good for you. And if you believe this is ideal recommendation then I've got this

Re: [Vserver] lock flag question

2004-06-10 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 02:57:10PM -0400, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: What does the lock flag do? It seems that requesting another context from within a context is impossible anyway? for now, yes. best, Herbert Grisha ___ Vserver mailing

Re: [Vserver] syncing vservers

2004-06-10 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:31:12PM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: Or some such terminology. What I am realizing is as I work in one vserver I add, mostly, perl packages that I then need to add in another vserver that does a similar job to the first. Then if I create a new vserver I'm

[Vserver] Vserver on 2.6.6 x86_64 version 1.9.1

2004-06-10 Thread Tristan Donaldson
Hi, I have patched the 2.6.6 kernel with the 1.9.1 vserver patch, but it doesn't seem to be working. chimay root # chcontext ls chcontext: vc_new_s_context(): Function not implemented chimay root # chimay root # uname -a Linux chimay 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 #1 Thu Jun 10 17:23:16 GMT 2004 x86_64 5

Re: [Vserver] Vserver on 2.6.6 x86_64 version 1.9.1

2004-06-10 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 07:50:14PM +0100, Tristan Donaldson wrote: Hi, I have patched the 2.6.6 kernel with the 1.9.1 vserver patch, but it doesn't seem to be working. chimay root # chcontext ls chcontext: vc_new_s_context(): Function not implemented chimay root # chimay root # uname

Re: [Vserver] new utils configuration

2004-06-10 Thread Enrico Scholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy) writes: I've been looking at the documentation for the new utils (nice stylesheet, btw), and it looks like there is a shift from using a single config file describing a vserver to a hierarchy of files (kinda reminds me of qmail)... Just

Re: [Vserver] new utils configuration

2004-06-10 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Enrico Scholz wrote: I justed needed something which is easy parseble by *both* C programs and shell scripts, and which supports the new features. The old .conf files support none of these requirements. The util-vserver commands seem to support the old files. I have a