On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 06:36:39PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 09:09:01AM -0500, Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
[all the funny details zapped]
> please give the testme.sh script (version 0.11) a try
> (http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/SCRIPT/testme.sh)
Linux-VServer Test [V0
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:28:49PM +0400, Peter V. Saveliev wrote:
> ...
>
> Now I plan to migrate to 1.9.5 & 2.6.11, 'cause of resource limits; and I
> have
> some questions:
>
> 1) is it right, that I've to create one directory
>
> /etc/vservers//interfaces/
>
> per interface and there can
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 09:09:01AM -0500, Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
>Enrico --- thanks for the quick help.
>The kernel is compiled with SELINUX, but also compiled with SELINUX
>disabled.
>The thing is, this was all working fine a short time ago; I'm
>completely boggle
...
Now I plan to migrate to 1.9.5 & 2.6.11, 'cause of resource limits; and I have
some questions:
1) is it right, that I've to create one directory
/etc/vservers//interfaces/
per interface and there can be only one address on such interface? I didn't
read the code, I'll do it while going to
Enrico --- thanks for the quick help.
The kernel is compiled with SELINUX, but also compiled with SELINUX
disabled.
The thing is, this was all working fine a short time ago; I'm
completely boggled! Should I recompile with those CFLAGS next, or what?
Enrico Scholz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Paul S. Gumerman") writes:
> Ran "vserver fc3-reference hashify", which ran ok with one message
> (sorry, can't recall it now).
The exact message would be helpful perhaps.
> Then tried "vserver loco-reference hashify" which failed with a
> message saying "vserver ... suexec
