Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's the kind of tests which can only be done by the developer ;)
But other work and fear of zombies stopped me to play with 'vserver
... stop' till now...
didn't get a bugreport regarding those zombies yet
afais, Gilles reported in [EMAIL
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:08:05AM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's the kind of tests which can only be done by the developer ;)
But other work and fear of zombies stopped me to play with 'vserver
... stop' till now...
didn't get a bugreport
Hello everyone,
I intend to use a dedicated filesystem for each vserver
(with lvm and drbd), but it seems that isn't what
vserver build expects:
# mkdir /var/lib/vservers/t1
# mount /dev/drbd0 /var/lib/vservers/t1
# vserver t1 build -m debootstrap
Hi Michal!
On 2005.05.19 17:21:44 +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
Hi all,
for anyone interested I did a patch of VServer 2.0-rc1 for the linux
kernel 2.6.12-rc4. Get here: http://www.logix.cz/michal/devel/vserver/
Great, lLooks quite good :) Updated my port from pre4 to rc1 [1] to check
for
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:27:18AM +0200, Alberto Cammozzo wrote:
Hello everyone,
I intend to use a dedicated filesystem for each vserver
(with lvm and drbd), but it seems that isn't what
vserver build expects:
# mkdir /var/lib/vservers/t1
# mount
Björn Steinbrink wrote:
Most of the differences are due to the *_mm_counter macros, which I
modified to call the Linux-VServer accounting stuff.
That was on my TODO list as well, but I probably wouldn't come up with
such a smart abuse of preprocessor as you did ;-)
#define inc_mm_counter(mm,
