On 2005.05.26 17:22:16 +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote: > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > Greetings Community! > > > > a fortnight after the first one, here is the second > > release candidate for the stable 2.6 series ... > > > > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.11.10-vs2.0-rc2.diff > > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.11.10-vs2.0-rc2.diff.bz2 > > > > please give it some testing, and let me know if there > > is anything which requires mending, if nothing is > > reported this might become the final 2.0 release ... > > And for 2.6.12-rc5: > http://www.logix.cz/michal/devel/vserver/patch-2.6.12-rc5-vs2.0-rc2.diff
Great! Also did a port to check for differences. Of course my port has the nr_tids++ bug again ;) The others were some comments which didn't get removed in your patch. My patch is at: http://www.13thfloor.at/~doener/vserver/patches/patch-2.6.12-rc5-vs2.0-rc2.diff (Didn't get a test compile/boot yet, but I trust your port to work and the differences are neglible in that regard [well except the nr_tids++] ;) Btw, did you get any feedback on the nr_tids++ thing yet? Thanks again Björn _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
