On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 02:59:40AM +0200, Andreas John wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I tried to build aplah tools on Debian Sid. I apt-ed libbeecrypt6
> libbeecrypt6-dev, hoping to be able to build 'vhashify' of 208 plus
> herbert's patches.
>
> But make says:
>
> checking for sys/capability.h... yes
>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 05:52:41PM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> > > Unable to find device-mapper major/minor
> > > Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while.
> >
> > sounds like either you are using lvm1 or you
> > somehow forced f
Hello!
I tried to build aplah tools on Debian Sid. I apt-ed libbeecrypt6
libbeecrypt6-dev, hoping to be able to build 'vhashify' of 208 plus
herbert's patches.
But make says:
checking for sys/capability.h... yes
checking beecrypt/beecrypt.h usability... yes
checking beecrypt/beecrypt.h prese
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > Unable to find device-mapper major/minor
> > Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while.
>
> sounds like either you are using lvm1 or you
> somehow forced fixed major/minor for device mapper,
> which are not available any longer (i.e. used
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:51:25PM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> Well it seems I've found the same problem others have but no solution.
> It seems to be something about Fedora Core 3, SMP, and later kernels
> from pristine sources ( or in the case vs2.0 patched ). There were a
> couple of me
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:56:20AM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> The 2.4.30 patch applied cleanly to 2.4.31 (except the top Makefile, of
> course) so I'm guessing it should work...
>
> It all seems good, but sometimes I get errors when trying to mount stuff
> into a vserver tree
>
> This works:
Well it seems I've found the same problem others have but no solution. It
seems to be something about Fedora Core 3, SMP, and later kernels from
pristine sources ( or in the case vs2.0 patched ). There were a couple of
mentions of SCSI RAID devices also.
This is a quad Xenon system with a "My
The 2.4.30 patch applied cleanly to 2.4.31 (except the top Makefile, of
course) so I'm guessing it should work...
It all seems good, but sometimes I get errors when trying to mount stuff
into a vserver tree
This works:
[root]/home/sweh
backup.pts/2% vserver webssh status
Server webssh is r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Roderick A. Anderson") writes:
> I went ahead and started building the utils as RPMs and ran
> into a couple of dependency issues. This is probably more an
> Enrico question.
>
> Why tetex-latex? Is it Redhat ( RPM ) build-documentation
> requirement?
It is only a build-req
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 05:06:36AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> > hmm, you obviously didn't use the (mandrake) rpms from
> > my page ... because they disable most of those ...
>
> It would be a first :-( for me ) to have a Mandrake RPM work o
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> hmm, you obviously didn't use the (mandrake) rpms from
> my page ... because they disable most of those ...
It would be a first :-( for me ) to have a Mandrake RPM work on a
non-Mandrake system. But I'm game. I'll give them a try.
I read the README
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:43:09AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> I probably wasn't clear on this.
>
> > given you do not disable legacy support, you can still use
> > the legacy tools for your shiny new vs2.0 kernel ...
>
> There is a vServer
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
I probably wasn't clear on this.
> given you do not disable legacy support, you can still use
> the legacy tools for your shiny new vs2.0 kernel ...
There is a vServer 2.6.10-vs1.94 kernel running but nothing important
guest-wise in on the system.
>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:00:03AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> I have built and installed a new kernel and nd getting ready to build the
> tools but have one question I've not seen asked or seen mentioned before.
> It is probably falls somewhere below "stupid" on the question scale.
>
I have built and installed a new kernel and nd getting ready to build the
tools but have one question I've not seen asked or seen mentioned before.
It is probably falls somewhere below "stupid" on the question scale.
Do I have to have the new kernel running to build the tools? I can't
reboot r
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> Greetings Community!
>
> after some time of testing and ironing out minor
> issues we proudly present the first stable release
> for the 2.6 kernels ...
Thanks Herbert.
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
16 matches
Mail list logo