[Vserver] The nano-vserver package.

2005-12-26 Thread Michael S. Zick
Joel, I got past my self created problems last night and have had a good night's sleep. I think my planned package is complete, I wanted to review it with someone, I will try to be brief... This is a single file, perhaps sized to fit on a cdrom. Any Linux system, any hardware, that recognizes

Re: [Vserver] The nano-vserver package.

2005-12-26 Thread Joel Soete
Hello Mike, Michael S. Zick wrote: Joel, I got past my self created problems last night and have had a good night's sleep. I think my planned package is complete, I wanted to review it with someone, I will try to be brief... This is a single file, perhaps sized to fit on a cdrom. Any Linux

Re: [Vserver] The nano-vserver package.

2005-12-26 Thread Michael S. Zick
On Mon December 26 2005 08:43, Michael S. Zick wrote: Joel, A sudden thought while reading my own post. The view from inside vsbox01 will have a more typical layout of the first and second level directory trees. I will give it a job. Configure the bb httpd server to serve the html

Re: [Vserver] The nano-vserver package.

2005-12-26 Thread Michael S. Zick
On Mon December 26 2005 09:15, Joel Soete wrote: Hello Mike, Michael S. Zick wrote: Joel, I think my planned package is complete, I wanted to review it with someone, I will try to be brief... - - - [ really big snip ] - - - What common tool set have I overlooked? Do you see

Re: [Vserver] Error when creating centos min vserver

2005-12-26 Thread John Maclean
I've been able to create a Debian vserver within CentOS 4.2 with no problems (http://linux-vserver.org/Step-by-Step+Guide+2.6). That guide is very good and I was impressed to see debootstrap working within a Yum-based distro and install packages within a vserver. I've tried a few methods to

Re: [Vserver] The nano-vserver package.

2005-12-26 Thread Chuck
On Monday 26 December 2005 10:38 am, Michael S. Zick wrote: On Mon December 26 2005 09:15, Joel Soete wrote: Hello Mike, Michael S. Zick wrote: Joel, I think my planned package is complete, I wanted to review it with someone, I will try to be brief... - - - [ really big

Re: [Vserver] The nano-vserver package.

2005-12-26 Thread Michael S. Zick
On Mon December 26 2005 11:44, Chuck wrote: On Monday 26 December 2005 10:38 am, Michael S. Zick wrote: I just checked, BusyBox has a vi for text editing. Should there be some other editor? I think that emacs would be too big. yes please... pico or nano either one.. both are small

[Vserver] Gentoo VServer Usage Survey

2005-12-26 Thread Benedikt Boehm
Hi all, just wanted to let all Gentoo users know (at least those who don't read Planet Gentoo) that i created a usage survey for gentoo users. Would be very kind if you could spend some minutes on the survey [1]. Regards, Benedikt [1] http://dev.croup.de/survey/survey.php?uid=243afa1992cbee

Re: [Vserver] The nano-vserver package.

2005-12-26 Thread Michael S. Zick
On Mon December 26 2005 08:43, Michael S. Zick wrote: - - - Really Big Snip - - - Today's update to the build guide is posted. Corrections and addition of extending the base system into a minimal system. On line at: http://www.morethan.org/step_step.html Download at:

[Vserver] Patched yum RPM for Fedora Core 3

2005-12-26 Thread Marinus Israel - Cillix Webhosting
Hello all, When using linux-vserver in combination with yum a patch must be applied to allow yum to work correctly in chroot environments. I have created an rpm with this patch (with some help from Bertl) for Fedora Core 3 that can be readily used. It is available from

Re: [Vserver] Patched yum RPM for Fedora Core 3

2005-12-26 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 01:11:26AM +0100, Marinus Israel - Cillix Webhosting wrote: Hello all, When using linux-vserver in combination with yum a patch must be applied to allow yum to work correctly in chroot environments. I have created an rpm with this patch (with some help from Bertl)

Re: [Vserver] The nano-vserver package.

2005-12-26 Thread Avery Pennarun
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 09:38:54AM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote: I just checked, BusyBox has a vi for text editing. Should there be some other editor? I think that emacs would be too big. e3 is an excellent but tiny text editor. It definitely beats nano or pico. Have fun, Avery

Re: [Vserver] The nano-vserver package.

2005-12-26 Thread Michael S. Zick
On Mon December 26 2005 12:58, Avery Pennarun wrote: On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 09:38:54AM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote: I just checked, BusyBox has a vi for text editing. Should there be some other editor? I think that emacs would be too big. e3 is an excellent but tiny text editor. It