After a weekend of shopping, I'm come back.So, I create a page in the wiki :http://linux-vserver.org/Vserver+CompletionAnd I create a link in the home page.
If you want others completions for others commands, tell it me.Thomas2006/1/20, Herbert Poetzl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at
Hi !
We have a very strange problem here with virtual IP addresses (various
up-to-date 2.6 kernels with vserver 2.0):
Let eth0 have a normal IP address. Let v1 and v2 be two vservers with a
virtual IP on eth0 each.
# vserver v1 start
# vserver v2 start
ifconfig shows eth0, eth0:v1, and
On 2006.01.23 12:31:53 +0100, Raimund Specht wrote:
Hi !
We have a very strange problem here with virtual IP addresses (various
up-to-date 2.6 kernels with vserver 2.0):
Let eth0 have a normal IP address. Let v1 and v2 be two vservers with a
virtual IP on eth0 each.
# vserver v1
Hi !
Björn Steinbrink write:
# ifconfig eth0:1 1.2.3.4
# ifconfig eth0:2 1.2.3.5
# ifconfig eth0:1 del 1.2.3.4
Yep, that's default behaviour... :/
If you add the first address for a subnet, this becomes the 'primary'
address for this subnet, all later added addresses becomes
Hello Herbert,
Just launch test of this patch against parisc-linux tree and seems to works
fine on 2 32bit up kernel of different hw.
The second system is a new vserver in preparation on which I hope to be able
to test a 64bit kernel up ;-)
Thx,
Joel
PS: btw is that
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:57:21PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Herbert,
Just launch test of this patch against parisc-linux tree and seems to
works fine on 2 32bit up kernel of different hw.
excellent, I would appreciate to get a posting similar to
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 13:27 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
So currently I can see to justifications for introducing
a separation between kpid_t pid_t.
1) pid virtualization
2) In kernel pids that act as weak references, and avoid
the problems of pid wrap-around.
It is an interesting
Hello, hope this isn't too far offtopic here but being a troller for a long
time here I've realized there is a great knowledge base so I wanted to at
least see if i could get some tips. I help run a small colocation company
in California and I am in the middle of recommending a new 'core router'
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:57:21PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Herbert,
Just launch test of this patch against parisc-linux tree and seems to
works fine on 2 32bit up kernel of different hw.
excellent, I would appreciate to get a posting similar to
