Hi,
probably a simple question: are the BME and CoW-link-breaking extensions
available as single patches. If yes, where? And for kernel 2.6.15?
thx,
Wilhelm
--
--
Wilhelm Meier
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Vserver mailing list
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:59:18AM +0100, J.Paechnatz wrote:
Herbert Poetzl schrieb:
how did you try?
(i.e. what filesystem, which partition, what options)
/dev/sda1 / ext3
defaults,tagxid,errors=remount-ro 0 1
gives failures on reboot, leaving /
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:40:29PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
Btw may I ask you to add this -n (i.e. no_color option) to
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:32:00PM +1300, Sam Vilain wrote:
Hey folks,
Some good news - I am currently working on getting vserver included
upstream. Attached is the plan, and links to the work-in-progress.
just for the record, I'm 'officially' supporting
the idea and will help Sam whenever
Guenther Fuchs wrote:
Hi there,
on Wednesday, February 1, 2006 at 1:28:24 PM there was posted:
GH Whitin the vserver, /etc/hostname file contains iserv
GH Any ideas?
Palce the hostname on the host in
/etc/vservers/[vserver-name]/uts/nodename
- this is the file which is used to create the
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:07:38PM +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
Hi,
probably a simple question: are the BME and CoW-link-breaking
extensions available as single patches.
If yes, where?
BME against mainline 2.6.16-rc1:
http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/split-2.6.16-rc1-bme0.06.2/
Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 12:09 schrieb Herbert Poetzl:
And for kernel 2.6.15?
nope, not publicly available atm, if you can make
a good argument, we can arrange something though.
Well, ...
I thought it would be interesting to look if it works together with the new
beta OpenVZ-2.6.15
2006/1/27, Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:15:43AM +0100, Jens Holze wrote:
2006/1/25, Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:45:55PM +0100, Jens Holze wrote:
2006/1/13, Jens Holze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/1/11, Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL
2006/2/1, Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- If I modify a file's contents the CoW link is broken properly but
after a chmod or chown the link is not broken and I get -EPERM (as the
files are marked immutable) - is this expected behaviour? In such a
situation the links aren't exactly
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Jens Holze wrote:
[a lot of stuff zapped here]
try to configure the tools with the following
./configure line instead (after you uninstalled
the currently installed ones wit e.g. make uninstall)
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:02:51PM +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote:
2006/2/1, Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- If I modify a file's contents the CoW link is broken properly but
after a chmod or chown the link is not broken and I get -EPERM (as the
files are marked immutable) - is this
Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 13:39 schrieb Herbert Poetzl:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:29:54PM +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 12:09 schrieb Herbert Poetzl:
And for kernel 2.6.15?
nope, not publicly available atm, if you can make
a good argument, we can
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 03:20:35PM +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 13:39 schrieb Herbert Poetzl:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:29:54PM +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 12:09 schrieb Herbert Poetzl:
And for kernel 2.6.15?
nope,
Herbert Poetzl schrieb:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:59:18AM +0100, J.Paechnatz wrote:
Herbert Poetzl schrieb:
how did you try?
(i.e. what filesystem, which partition, what options)
/dev/sda1 / ext3
defaults,tagxid,errors=remount-ro 0 1
gives failures on reboot,
hi there...
my vserver host has some interfaces connected to some subnets.
my vserver guest reside on a specific interface with an ip address of
the hosts subnet.
example:
host server
two interfaces:
eth7 192.168.80.15 (set via half-static dhcp, behaviour with pure static
address is the
I have recently been doing some vserver related kernel development
but have had no luck CC my patches to the vserver list. This
last round because I CC to many interested parties.
Is the vserver list supposed to be a place where we can post
patches for discussion?
Eric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joel,
Please do not hijack threads, it is better to start a new thread with a
new subject. If you use an existing thread to talk about something
completely different than the thread's subject, it causes a lot of
problems with mail and news readers.
On Thu February 2 2006 12:21, Micah Anderson wrote:
Joel,
- - - snip
What is toh? I would prefer to use dietlibc if possible as it seems to
be required to handle some corner security issues.
(on) The Other Hand
Mike
(But tbh I'm still ignoring what kind of pb am I supposed to
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:55:53AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
I have recently been doing some vserver related kernel development
but have had no luck CC my patches to the vserver list. This
last round because I CC to many interested parties.
Is the vserver list supposed to be a place
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest
0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this
time) and all seems
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 15:20 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
is the argument good enough for you to supply the split bme and cow patches
for 2.6.15?
2.6.15? That's like ancient history, man.
There's a historic release here; it's for a much older release, but
maybe it will apply without much
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest
0.30.210), I disabled use
Hello all,
i have some trouble with vservers. I use debian sarge and proceeded
verbatim along this instructions
http://linux-vserver.org/Step-by-Step+Guide+2.6
including the versions mentioned there.
Everything goes fine except this step :
# It's a good point to fix the /proc entries
On Thu February 2 2006 14:09, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it
is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc
is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_
work for
Hi there,
as stated in the HowTo - crond just got updated and replaced the
modified /etc/pam.d/crond file.
So if you're running vixie-cron (on a FC4 guest) you need again to
comment out the pam_loginuid.so line as stated:
http://linux-vserver.org/VServer+installation+Fedora+Core+4#g6
--
Hello.
Everything goes fine except this step :
# It's a good point to fix the /proc entries for the guests
/etc/init.d/vprocunhide restart
vprocunhide does not exist there
That script is to be run on the _host_ (part of util-vserver package).
Best,
Gilles
Hi,
I have just setup a new box with gentoo and vserver:
uname -an:
Linux opteron 2.6.15.1-vs2.1.0.5.1 #531 SMP Tue Jan 31 18:49:53 EET 2006
i686 Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275 AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
equery list vserver:
[ Searching for package 'vserver' in all categories
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:33:16PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Thu February 2 2006 14:09, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it
is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:28:33AM +0200, Dimitris Zilaskos wrote:
Hi,
I have just setup a new box with gentoo and vserver:
uname -an:
Linux opteron 2.6.15.1-vs2.1.0.5.1 #531 SMP Tue Jan 31 18:49:53 EET 2006
i686 Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 275 AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
On Thu February 2 2006 19:32, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:33:16PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Thu February 2 2006 14:09, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:08:38PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Thu February 2 2006 19:32, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:33:16PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Thu February 2 2006 14:09, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:08:40 +0100
J.Paechnatz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I played with the rlimits, rss/as are working fine. but how could I
limit cpu usage, for example 25% of the hosts cpu capacity? the cpu
directive is for cpu time in secondshow much is realistic!? and how
it's
hi,
it seems possible to have localhost inside a guest. here is what I did
interface/0
dev - lo
ip - 127.0.0.1
prefix - 32
but when a daemon binds to a localhost port and the guest has external
interface, I'm able to access that service using guest external IP. I
just want to verify is this the
33 matches
Mail list logo
