On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 03:34:28PM +0100, Rik Bobbaers wrote:
>
>
> Jaroslav Tomecek wrote:
> >I'm testing 'vserver' for some organisation. They want me to test
> >everything ;-). Btw. I tried cpu scheduling. I set 1/5 of cpu for
> >the first and 4/5 of cpu for the second 'vserver'. Then I ran tw
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 01:37:36AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did as you suggested, disabling sendfile in apache removes
> the problem tho didnt found any patches whitch would apply
> (delta-sendfile-fix02/03 are for development version i think, and 04
> made it even worse)
>
> a
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 12:09, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:12:44AM +0100, Attila - Van der Velde Media
wrote:
> > To me it feels like the 32bit guest is running faster than when it
> > stands alone.
>
> What's the invocation for vserver build? I'm currently doing something
>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:12:44AM +0100, Attila - Van der Velde Media wrote:
> To me it feels like the 32bit guest is running faster than when it
> stands alone.
What's the invocation for vserver build? I'm currently doing something
like
#!/bin/sh
set -x
IP=$1
vserver v${IP} build --force -n
To me it feels like the 32bit guest is running faster than when it
stands alone.
ehab heikal schreef:
Is there any performance hit for running a 32bit guest in a 64 bit host?
<<* ella for Spam Control *>> has removed *382
