Although dhcp packets use UDP, they're very weird UDP packets because the
client doesn't necessarily have an IP address at the time it needs to
receive them. Thus, dhcpd uses a different socket layer than normal
UDP/TCP, which I gather from the above is not divided between contexts in
В Сбт, 27.05.2006, в 14:17, Andrew Schulman пишет:
dhcpd don`t use udp sockets. dhcpd use raw socket and receive packets
via bpfX device. It`s one one reason who dhcpd don`t work with later
versions FreeVPS, but now i release patch to fix it and use L2 address
to inter context routing.
I know about it.
some network function changed and it`s add incompatibility with vmware
and have fixes for vmware.
at http://www.freevps.com/download/vmware/ uploaded sources for VmWare
workstation 4.5.1 if you need for different version - please mail me or
at freevps list.
В Втр,
В Срд, 25.01.2006, в 18:47, Herbert Poetzl пишет:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 03:35:23PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote:
Hi,
It seems that abstract UNIX sockets leak from a vserver. I'm trying to run
the same java app inside two vservers and only the first one started
succeeds.
The
В Срд, 25.01.2006, в 19:07, Herbert Poetzl пишет:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 06:51:14PM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
? ???, 25.01.2006, ? 18:47, Herbert Poetzl ?:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 03:35:23PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote:
Hi,
It seems that abstract UNIX sockets leak from
В Срд, 25.01.2006, в 19:51, Herbert Poetzl пишет:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 07:27:11PM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
? ???, 25.01.2006, ? 19:07, Herbert Poetzl ?:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 06:51:14PM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
? ???, 25.01.2006, ? 18:47, Herbert Poetzl ?:
On Wed
Virtual Machine (Emulators/Simulators):
(allows for unmodified guest systems)
- Bochs - VMware
- QEMU- SoftPC
- Hercules- VirtualPC
- GXemul
- UAE
Parallels
http://www.parallels.com/en/download/
--
FreeVPS
В Срд, 07.12.2005, в 16:34, Herbert Poetzl пишет:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:44:43AM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
(will use Z for OpenVZ and S for Linux-VServer)
Factors of interest are
- stability,
Z: the announcement reads first stable OVZ version
S: we
FreeVPS stores pointer to context structure, at kernel object (more
work, debugging, but much faster access to data, that is needed for
each context switch).
hmm, again JFYI, linux-vserver uses both, context references
as well as xid information, wherever the one or the other
applies
(will use Z for OpenVZ and S for Linux-VServer)
Factors of interest are
- stability,
Z: the announcement reads first stable OVZ version
S: we are at version 2.0.1 ( two years stable releases)
And all this time VServer need a hack for allow bind socket to
INADDR_ANY at VPS ;-)
Z
ngnet was delayed several times because it is not
really necessary to have and of course network
virtualization adds overhead and 'might' affect
stability (as the kernel networking is changing
very heavily with every release)
I don`t right. Network virtualization reduse overhead of using
, 03.03.2005, 18:57, Brian Ipsen :
Hi,
Hmm.. I wonder why the rpm command suddenly decides to take
up so much CPU time ... :-/
try to attach with strace to that rpm command (once it is
running) or even via gdb, and see what it is doing ...
most likely it's some kind of rpm
, no iptables)
Looks like this setting influences somehow routing - is it possible?
(2.4.26-vs1.27)
http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg05959.html
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
) is not
are good for work.
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
to RH kernel, because this kernel have many
changes with vanilla kernel. I know Sam Villiam (?) have changes for
Vserver and it applied to RH 7.3 kernels.
Alex Lyashkov wrote:
, 19.08.2004, 15:46, Ehab Heikal :
Yes I know most of the time this is the case, but still I would feel
cached route entry.
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSoft
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
cpu/ram per month doesn't seem very useful to me - but vserver
allows you to set absolute soft/hard ram/cpu limits.
vserver can limit only total address space (total vm size) - Herbert say
it`s been fixed with new memory accounting.
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSoft
.
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSoft
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
caches
and routing tables not possible. and Vserver not have it.
I report about this bug to list, because freevps have same problem at
one of old snapshot.
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSoft
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSoft
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
do) it really bad idea.
Today, two first points been finished and available in FreeVPS CVS.
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSoft
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
, 02.04.2004, 17:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
It's something like pool - what people using for traffic/bandwidth
limitation?
FreeVPS 1.2
vifconfig --ctx N --device Name --txspeed Zk
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home
___
Vserver mailing list
in the future?
Grisha
current vserver - not.
Try FreeVPS - her allow use iptables inside vps.
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSoft
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
/make_rpm/.
Also kernel can be downloaded via anonymous cvs
cvs -z9 -d
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/spool/cvs/freevps-rh-as checkout
-r FREEVPS_1_2_RC1 kernel
Web cvs for project http://freevps.org.ua/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi
Any feedbacks a welcome.
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSoft
, 05.03.2004, 21:01, Asbjrn Sannes :
On Friday 05 March 2004 11:14, Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote:
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4) IPv6 support. Zones have it, vserver does not.
It realy need ?
I'd say yes. :-) This is one of the main issues preventing me from
switching
for
that?
Hi. None. It was my mistake. man bash is very ppor about ulimits... :( Still trying
to find solution.
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Try CPU CAP.
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL
/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
Alex Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
and quotas
- ...
Am Fre, den 27.02.2004 schrieb Alex Lyashkov um 09:11:
, 27.02.2004, 10:03, Thomas Gelf :
is it possible to realize this?
how much work would it be?
the first part (tun/tap interface == virtual eth0 inside the vserver,
bridge them to real eth0, allow CAP_NET_ADMIN
On Thursday 12 February 2004 13:58, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Viorel Anghel wrote:
My first post here and i would like to thank to all the developers for
their terrific work.
Now, my problem. Short story: kernel 2.4.24, vserver 1.26 (no other
patches). bind9 with nocapset (Paul
On Monday 09 February 2004 19:10, Tom Walsh wrote:
I am about to set up a brand new Vserver and am wondering
would it be better to use Redhat 9.0 or 7.3 as the Vserver
root server?
Is Redhat 9.0 fully compatible as a root Vserver?
My thought is that there are fewer packages being
On Friday 06 February 2004 18:58, Ondej Sur wrote:
Hi,
BEWARE this patch brokes Debian!
dpkg does:
mkdir(blah/blah.dpkg-new, 0)
chmod(blah/blah.dpkg-new, 0755)
And chmod obviously fails. Proper fix should probably check exact inode
of /vservers/ dir and protect only this one particular
On Friday 30 January 2004 01:13, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
n Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:34:00PM -0500, Igor Seletskiy wrote:
Hi Herbert,
My name is Igor Seletskiy. I own psoft (maker of freeVPS). I wander what
are your thoughts about merging linux-vserver freeVPS?
I believe at some points
On Saturday 24 January 2004 00:58, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:42:12AM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
On Saturday 24 January 2004 00:25, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
Hi Community!
another quite big step in vserver evolution awaits
your testing/approval ;)
I had
On Saturday 24 January 2004 00:25, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
Hi Community!
another quite big step in vserver evolution awaits
your testing/approval ;)
I had to get 1.3.6 out, before I start attacking the
network and virtualization issues, and this seemed
like a good time, so here it is:
On Monday 15 December 2003 14:43, Sam Stickland wrote:
I believe you have to disable /etc/rc.d/init.d/network script
(chkconfig --del network). It'll be trying to shut down the eth0 interface,
which will obviously crash inside a vserver. There's also a few other
runlevel scripts that need to
On Monday 15 December 2003 23:41, Kern Wolfgang wrote:
Hello List,
my question is simple: Can I supervise, on the host system, the Traffic of
every single VServer?
If every VServer could have a network interface of its own, like eth0:VM1,
then i can read the traffic of this virtual
On Monday 08 December 2003 13:29, Jan Zuchhold wrote:
Hello List!
I just tested vs1.20 and it appears that fcntl locking on NFS shares
mounted inside a vserver is still broken, as I reported some time ago
(04.11.2003). I quote from my other posts:
The share is mounted like this in the
On Saturday 06 December 2003 14:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Alex,
I have downloaded the new freevps stuff, and I have it working fairly well.
My question is this, will I need to add CAP_SYS_RESOURCE to the .conf
file for the vserver, in order to make bind work? and can I do a
On Monday 01 December 2003 16:41, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:15:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Herbert,
I have a question to ask? what is the difference between
the current vserver, and Freevps?
well, FreeVPS is a late branch of vserver which was done
AL also with virtual root and privated disknamespace
AL which allowed use mount inside vps.
well, allowing mount inside a vserver _is_ a security
risk, as it allows to mount _any_ other partition including
the root of the host ...
if not create nodes for it and disable mknode ?
also
On Monday 01 December 2003 22:32, Alex Klymov wrote:
Hello Alex,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 10:22:42 AM, you wrote:
AL On Monday 01 December 2003 16:41, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:15:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Herbert,
I have a question to ask?
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 00:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Alex,
Will the new freevps stuff work on redhat9, or only 7.3?
It`s rpm builded at rh 7.3 box, i think it must work with RH 8, but RH 9 have
many many changes in kernel/glibc..
You can try it - but I don`t test with RH 9.
Next
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 07:50, Charles Dale wrote:
It's a bit hard to read what you posted because after a certain point all
the hard returns seem to have been folded. But I think you have this in
your redhat9.conf:
S_CAPS=CAP_NET_RAW CAP_SYS_ADMIN CAP_NET_ADMIN
Change that to
Therefore, it will not make sense to hope on a magic chrootsafe() syscall
for vservers. Alternative approaches like CLONE_NEWNS in combination with
pivot_root() or 'mount --rbind vdir /' (suggested by Rik van Riel) must
be investigated to find better methods.
I say Rik and Herber - vserver
44 matches
Mail list logo
