Hi
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:43:15PM +0400, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > First of all this is not a bug in util-vserver. It is at most
> > a bug in mysql-server, but in this case it is not that either.
> No, it isn't. Mysqld
.
> > >> >> >> Filesystems are ext3.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Thanks for any help!
> > >> >> >> PC
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >&g
use Linux'. "
> The Book of John, chapter 1, page 1, and end of book
>
>
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
> configure script and other files.
Ok. I think this really should be applied upstream as well. Or even better
applied upstream and then I will use the new tarball. :)
> [1] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/SYSCALL/vserver.h
Ok. Lot of defines here. :)
Regards,
// Ola
>
but guests (only having eth1 activated!) try to
> connect direct through this eth0 ip which they naturally can't use so
> traffic stops completely 8-(
>
> Any idea's/hint's?
>
> --
> regards,
>
> Guenther Fuchs
>
> ___
> Vserve
http://www.leitl.org
> 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
- Ola
Hello
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:53:26PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 03:39:07PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
...
> > > they are supported, but unfortunately not tested yet
> > > we will do so pretty soon, and a tiny patch (fix04)
> > >
Hello
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 08:12:57PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 06:49:47PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > As you probably know I'm the maintainer of util-vserver in Debian.
> >
> > When the autobu
st like you did. What I also did was to load the kernel module on the
host system (not in the vserver). It worked like a charm. However it was some
time ago and on 2.4 kernel.
Regards,
// Ola
> Greets, Torsten
>
> ________
g/fetch.php?&pkg=util-vserver&ver=0.30.208-3&arch=mips&stamp=1128792161&file=log&as=raw
Are these two arches not supported anymore?
In 0.30.204 it successfully compiled (at least).
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMA
Hello
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:01:08PM -0500, Micah wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ola,
>
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> >>>>The debian maintainer is working on .208 debs now:
> >>>>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Hello
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:49:54PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Just uploaded 208 debs for Debian. Please test.
>
> thanks a lot Ola!
>
> btw, did you incorporate the upda
but
> have no idea where to get the binary package from.
http://incoming.debian.org/
Regards,
// Ola
> Cheers,
> Thomas Gelf
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2005, 12:49 +0200 schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
> > Hello
> >
> > Just uploaded 208 debs for Debian. Please test.
&
Hello
Just uploaded 208 debs for Debian. Please test.
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:32:31AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:47:49PM +0200, Harald Kapper wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:19:45 + (UTC), John Goerzen &l
u."
> _______
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
----- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30
all f*ckups]=-
>
>
> _______
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anneber
/FxSpNs=
> =ldQX
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/
Hello
I found the solution myself. I had obviously added that option
myself as it was previously needed to build on sparc. Now it
has been removed so I assume it is ok.
Sorry for bothering you.
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:00:42AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> forwarded 321
o: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:33:01 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debi
Hello
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:20:34PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:45:26PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > My suggestion is not to use dietlibc and thus change the build .
> > dependencie
rnelheaders: /lib/modules/2.6.11.6-smp-vs.1.9.5/build/include
> vserver-Rootdir: /vservers
>
> The build errors seemed to be mostly about parsing errors.
>
> Any ideas would be great.
>
>
> Thanks
> Mike
> _
so I happily started to
commit things. Hope you do not mind. :)
Regards,
// Ola
>
>
>
> Enrico
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslinga
Forgot to give Debian bug references.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:14:22PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hello
>
> I got a report that vserver output wrong infomration when
> outputting the help.
>
> ---
> From: Thorsten Gunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
bugs.debian.org/30654
ns 2> /dev/null | grep ^base-config | grep
"mirror/suite" | awk '{ print $4 }'
An other option is to parse /etc/apt/sources.list but that won't be
reliable.
---
If a new version will fix that I would be happy otherwise I'll
try to fix it myself.
Reg
[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.206'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
You can see the full build log at:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=util-vserver&ver=0.30.206-3&arch=ia64&stamp=1113943529&file=log&as=raw
Regards,
clude that
> the problem is with chbind:
>
> [00010a90] open("/proc/net/dev", O_RDONLY) = 3
> [00010a90] read(3, "Inter-| Receive "..., 8192) = 1553
> [00010a90] read(3, "", 6639)= 0
> [00010a90] close(3) =
r?
>
> greetz Dennis
>
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37
\w: http://www.northernscum.org.uk /
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
- Ola Lund
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:39:25PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > >* util-vserver, do it work?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > no
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the information. It is good to k
gt; E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.interware.hu/
>
>
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAI
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:37:31PM -0400, Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
>
>
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> >Hello
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:44:07PM -0400, Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>dietlibc version 0.28 built fine on x86_64,
libc, do it work?
* util-vserver, do it compile?
* util-vserver, do it work?
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 05:33:37PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:35:40AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 05:16:28PM +0100, Gaz Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any experience
0 ICQ:342070475 AIM:dragonv480 | _ >
> `.( `--' w: http://volvo480.northernscum.org.uk `--' ).'
>\w: http://www.northernscum.org.uk /
> ___
> V
'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[3]: *** [src/filetime] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.203'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.203'
Hello
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 04:48:22PM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > Well then I would use exprimental instead. Let us start there at least.
>
> Great, Herbert has offered his help in creating a Debian Kernel 2.6.8
> vser
a
> Grisha
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 06:58:40PM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > > > An example would be the difference between kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity
> > > > (for 2.4 kernels and old grsec) and kernel-patch-grsecurity2 (for 2.6
> > If the maintainer of the -ctx patch and of util-vserver wishes to
> > continue to maintain those old packages and does not wish to maintain
> > the package for the newer kernel patch and newer utilities, we should
> > have no problem with that. We simply solve what is
ver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD
Hello
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:24:42PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:53:41AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > This is just my opinion on this matter.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:41:04AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl w
__
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergssling
erver/buildlog_stderr.log
> >
> > probably heavily depends on the used compiler ...
>
> Debian default currently would be gcc 3.3, or so.
Some arches use 3.3 and some 3.4 as far as I know.
> Stephen
Regards,
// Ola
> ___
> Vserver mailing
Hello
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2004.12.21 18:09:29 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I know that this thread is old but I have to answer as I'm the
> > maintainer.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2004
> > > ___
> > > > > Vserver mailing list
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
>
ere's the difference, apart from the fact that all outdated .ctx
> files are removed? Your patch removes exactly those files that would not
> lead to the result that a vserver is considered running...
The problem is that you can get wrong hostname set when a context
file w
Hello
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 06:28:35PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 06:09:29PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I know that this thread is old but I have to answer as I'm the
> > maintainer.
> >
> > On
then
@@ -474,6 +488,7 @@
exit 1
elif [ "$2" = "start" ] ; then
echo Starting the virtual server $1
+ check_consistency
testperm $1
if ! $VSERVER_CMD $1 running
then
- End forwarded message -
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
#x27;t fit a project very well. Linux-VServer is such a project as it
> seems.
Well I do not really see your problem here. If you want to use
development branch you have to use it from upstream. Stable versions
is what is intended for release, or do I misunderstand something here?
Regards,
// Ola
> Bjoe
Hello
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:35:21AM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > I have got a wishlist request on vserver package.
> >
> > See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253518
> >
> > Do you think
Hello again. :)
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:22:30PM +0200, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
> On Di, 2004-08-17 at 22:11, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > > So you say that setattr (that is already included) is better than
> > > > vproc?
> > >
> > > Ah, i forgot to
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:24:43PM +0200, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
> On Di, 2004-08-17 at 21:13, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:54:33PM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> > >
> > > > I got a request to include the quotatools into util-vserver
Hello
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:22:30PM +0200, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
> On Di, 2004-08-17 at 22:11, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > > So you say that setattr (that is already included) is better than
> > > > vproc?
> > >
> > > Ah, i forgot to mention
Hello
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:08:19PM +0200, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
> On Di, 2004-08-17 at 21:14, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:35:06PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:58:38PM +0200, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
> > >
ersions do need it. Else you can log in once to the vserver and then no
> more for your system reports a missing /proc (even though it's mounted
> and readable).
Ok. So for later kernel patches we need to have this tool.
I'll include it then.
Regards,
// Ola
> --
> Bes
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:35:06PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:58:38PM +0200, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
> > On Di, 2004-08-17 at 14:37, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I have got a request to include vproc
iling list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +4
Hello
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:58:38PM +0200, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
> On Di, 2004-08-17 at 14:37, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I have got a request to include vproc into util-vserver.
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=2580
Hello
I have got a wishlist request on vserver package.
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253518
Do you think util-vserver should behave like this?
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello
I got a request to include the quotatools into util-vserver
(actually vserver but Debian has changed to util-vserver now).
See http://bugs.debian.org/253518
Do you think that is a good idea and will it be included later?
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist
Hello
I have got a request to include vproc into util-vserver.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=258038
Where can I find that tool, and do you think it will work with
the stable release of util-vserver?
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist
+0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 05:56:36PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > My debian patch can be found at:
> >
> > http://debian.opal.dhs.org/patch-2.4.26-vs1.28.diff
> >
> > The full patch set is available a
> >
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 10:22:30PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 05:56:36PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > My debian patch can be found at:
> >
> > http://debian.opal.dhs.org/patch-2.4.26-vs1.28.diff
> >
> > T
02PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 02:29:01PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm the maintainer of kernel-patch-ctx in Debian. I have prepared a version of
> > 1.28 for
> > debian of the kernel patch. I had to modi
tput_key(struct rtable **, struct flowi *flp);
extern int ip_route_output_flow(struct rtable **rp, struct flowi *flp,
struct sock *sk, int flags);
I can probably fix this but I do not want to create a bug so I need
to know what this function should accomplish.
Best regar
.
> (Oh, and thanks all for the good and quick feedback!)
Best regards,
// Ola
> //conny
>
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
- Ola Lundqvist --
TYPE=sv_SE
>
> Versions of packages kernel-patch-ctx depends on:
> ii bash 2.05b-14 The GNU Bourne Again SHell
> ii grep-dctrl2.1.3 Grep Debian package information
> ii patch
le release is not available in the near
> future (next 4 weeks or so) because it needs some time before it will
> enter Debian experimental and it will be obsolent by your stable
> release.
>
> --
> Noèl Köthe
> Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
--
-
; Vserver mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6
Thanks. It is applied now. Have not read this mailinglist for some
time.
Regards,
// Ola
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 08:49:26PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 09:36:23PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > New vserver-0.29 packages will be available for unstable now
&g
> vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed!
> http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
--
ebian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.26/kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-1.diff.gz
>
> Ola Lundqvist and Ron Lee are the current maintainers of the Debian
> package that includes patches against various versions of the Debian
> source trees.
>
> Maintainer information about
Hello
Very preliminary util-vserver packages for Debian is available
(unstable) on http://debian.opal.dhs.org/
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 09:30:20PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 09:29:22PM +0100, Kern Wolfgang wrote:
> > Hello Ola,
> >
> > I needed no Patch, only install the packet e2fslibs-dev. Everything was then
> > compilled wonderful
to get things right. If anyone has already
> done the hard part, I'd hesitate to do the work again :-)
>
> Thanks, Thomas
>
>
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/li
ion
before I upload it. Is vserver-0.29 backwards compatible with old kernel patches
like ctx17 and such?
Regards,
// Ola
> Nevertheless thanks for your help!
>
>
> Regards
> Wolfgang
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMA
*
> > The patch is available at:
> > http://www.opal.dhs.org/involved/patch/kernel-patch-ctx/patch-2.4.22-3xfs-vs1.21.diff
*SNIP*
--
--------- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMA
> Jacques Gelinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed!
> http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc
> _______
> Vserver mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.linu
Hello
And for the ones that downloaded too early I had to fix that patch.
It should work now. Compilation is in progress here and I should know
in half an hour or so. I do not tell anything else it works for me.
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 05:52:40PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote
11, 2003 at 12:45:57AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:37:12PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >
> > > is 2.4.22-3 still the current debian patch?
> >
> > That is the version I have installed here anyway.
> >
> > > if so, I
Hi
Thanks a lot. Will be tried later today.
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:45:57AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:37:12PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >
> > > is 2.4.22-3 still the current debian patch?
> >
> > That is the
,
> >
> > // Ola
> >
> > > best,
> > > Herbert
> > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > // Ola
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > - Ola Lundqvist ---
Hi
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:10:34PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:12:30PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:07:40PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Everyone!
> > >
ver mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
|
the Debian patched kernels.
Is this something that can be solved easily? The 1.00 versions
did work just fine.
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'outgoing' connects, regardless of the
> routing setup (or at least as fallback,
> if using 0.0.0.0 fails)
>
> b) we add a 'source' address to the vserver
> config, which by default, is 0.0.0.0 and
> can be assigned some other ip (probably
> restricted to IPs from the co
]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30
get rid of the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is!
This is really really strange. I have checked several times now
that I write
Cut and paste my headers (use emacs to write mail):
---
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [Vserv
Hi
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:56:05AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:29:01AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> [utmost improtant information bluntly removed]
>
> > > c) could you please report 'bugs' via the list like the
> > >
-0.28
> hopefully will ...
Ok.
*SNIP*
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332
> > > > I'll work on a new patchset for util-vserver.
> > >
> > > you should communicate with enrico, I assume
> > > he will help you, to make an 'initial' port/adaptation ...
> >
> > Ok.
>
> best,
> Herbert
>
Hi
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 08:31:18AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 07:42:55AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi
>
> Hi Ola!
>
> > Now I finally found this message.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:29:40AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl
vulnerability so the variables are
now quoted too.
Hope that this is useful.
I'll try to port these fixes to util-vserver.
Regards,
// Ola
--
----- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [
; >
> > ___
> > Vserver mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-
d40c04ff
> CapBset: d40c04ff
>
> which I consider correct, as CAP_QUOTACTL should be
> optional ...
>
> please explain/fix
>
> TIA,
> Herbert
>
> ___
> V
g list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
|
t; | Sto. Ovídio 4400-025 V. N. de Gaia
> | Portugal
> | T: +351 22 3745730/3/5 F: +351 22 3745738
> | G: +351 93 6371253 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | H: http://lms.ispgaya.pt/
> +-
> ÿÿÿÕ±êïz¹X§X¬µ[ ®÷
100 matches
Mail list logo
