>>>>>>Note: allowed ./configure to autodetect dietlibc
>>>>>>from config.log
>>>>>>...
>>>>>>configure:9473: checking whether to enable dietlibc
>>>>>>configure:9533: result: yes (autodetected, 0.29)
>&g
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 11:50:09AM +0200, Falk Hamann wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:55:18 -0600
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > See the previous post regarding crux documentation. If still having
> > issues, do the following. It will probably help people troubleshoot
> > your issue.
>
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:55:18 -0600
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> See the previous post regarding crux documentation. If still having
> issues, do the following. It will probably help people troubleshoot
> your issue.
>
> Download, run and paste output back to list
> http://vserver.13thfloor.a
So the host is crux (version ??)
So the guest is crux (version ??)
Later
Sig
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Falk Hamann
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 6:27 AM
To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: Re: [Vserver] [EMAIL PROTECTED
3 AM
To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: [Vserver] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I read the manual to install vserver on crux.
http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg09371.html
I followed each step. But starting vserver fails.
# vserver vcrux01 start
save_ctxinfo: open("/usr/var/run/vserve
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:12:09 +0200
Xavier Montagutelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does the /usr/var/run/vservers/ directory exists ?
>
> If no : create it
>
> If yes : what happens if you try
> "touch /usr/var/run/vservers/vcrux01" before vserver .. start ?
Yes the directory exists.
If I touc
On Thursday 13 April 2006 14:02, Falk Hamann wrote:
> I read the manual to install vserver on crux.
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg09371.html
> I followed each step. But starting vserver fails.
>
> # vserver vcrux01 start
> save_ctxinfo: open("/usr/var/run/vservers/vcrux01"): No
I read the manual to install vserver on crux.
http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg09371.html
I followed each step. But starting vserver fails.
# vserver vcrux01 start
save_ctxinfo: open("/usr/var/run/vservers/vcrux01"): No such file or
An error occured while executing the vserver star
Rik Bobbaers wrote:
stable: yes, secure... well... as far as possible, BUT!
multipath using devicemapper in their kernel? almost impossible, unless the
backported that entirely from 2.6.13 (of some 2.6.12 rcX)
a lot of other enhancements in 2.6.8+ kernels... it's for a reason that
kernels ge
> ngnet was delayed several times because it is not
> really necessary to have and of course network
> virtualization adds overhead and 'might' affect
> stability (as the kernel networking is changing
> very heavily with every release)
>
I don`t right. Network virtualization reduse overhead of us
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:45:42PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> Any counter-comments, from a VServer strengths point of view?
>
> - Forwarded message from Kir Kolyshkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: Kir Kolyshkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:17:18 +0300
> To: [EMAIL
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 15:45, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Any counter-comments, from a VServer strengths point of view?
i'll try to get some points together here... i'm not an experienced user of
vserver, but i have some remarks here...
> - Forwarded message from Kir Kolyshkin <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Any counter-comments, from a VServer strengths point of view?
- Forwarded message from Kir Kolyshkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Kir Kolyshkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:17:18 +0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Users] VServer vs OpenVZ
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunde
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:33:48AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hello
>
> I found the solution myself. I had obviously added that option
> myself as it was previously needed to build on sparc. Now it
> has been removed so I assume it is ok.
>
> Sorry for bothering you.
np, hope you updated the
Hello
I found the solution myself. I had obviously added that option
myself as it was previously needed to build on sparc. Now it
has been removed so I assume it is ok.
Sorry for bothering you.
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:00:42AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> forwarded 321171 vs
forwarded 321171 vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
thanks
Hello
I tried to contact the submitter but his mailserver refused my email
as I use a ... known spam host. Interesting...
Well to the point.
Do you know of such build problems. Is there any recent versions
of gcc (like gcc4) that do not sup
On 2004.12.21 20:20:12 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
> *SNIP*
> > > Some analysis:
> > >
> > > /usr/sbin/vserver script:
> > >
> > > Context of new vserver is set
> > > - by /etc/vservers/name.conf
> > > - or by /var
Hello
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
*SNIP*
> > Some analysis:
> >
> > /usr/sbin/vserver script:
> >
> > Context of new vserver is set
> > - by /etc/vservers/name.conf
> > - or by /var/run/vservers/name.ctx
> > - or by the chcontext script itself
> >
> >
On 2004.12.21 18:19:26 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hello
>
> I forward this bugreport that I have got from
> Helmut Toplitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> that fix a problem
> with context misunderstanding at start of a vserver.
>
> It is a quite simple patch and as far as I have tested it works fine.
>
Hello
I forward this bugreport that I have got from
Helmut Toplitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> that fix a problem
with context misunderstanding at start of a vserver.
It is a quite simple patch and as far as I have tested it works fine.
It is applied to the debian version of util-vserver.
For full in
20 matches
Mail list logo
