On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, EKC wrote:
Needless to say, it is becoming increasingly difficult to backup the
Vservers.
Why? Use a good backup software and good tape drives backups would not ba
a problem. I recomend Bacula, www.bacula.org.
The ideal solution would be a highly-scalable distributed
Hi!
Mandag 14 november 2005 17:42, skrev EKC:
> I have a group of nine Linux boxes each running several Vservers. Each
> Vserver is a self-contained webhost with Apache, MySQL, Qmail, etc...
> The Vserver "images" on each machine reside on the local hard disk.
> There are no network shares (AFS, e
We are running with a GFS setup currently and it works good for the most part. Lustre will not work with vservers until the lustre designers get their stuff working in the kernel. That is the route we prefer to go but until that happens it just doesn't work. We have spent a great deal of tim
Hi,
I run my vServer with DRBD - this means you can only have one actve
mount at a time, but in case of failover it takes less than a minute to
remount the backup node...
Oliver
--
Diese Nachricht wurde digital unterschrieben
oliwel's public key: http://www.oliwel.de/oliwel.crt
Basiszertifika
Hello,
I have a group of nine Linux boxes each running several Vservers. Each
Vserver is a self-contained webhost with Apache, MySQL, Qmail, etc...
The Vserver "images" on each machine reside on the local hard disk.
There are no network shares (AFS, etc...)
Needless to say, it is becoming increas
