hello,
i'm an active and very pleased user of vserver, but only passive mailing
member. thank you very much for that software.
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
as everybody else i receive a lot of spam everyday, many from mailing
It seems clear that the mailing list is starting see an
increased level of spam that will only get worse as the
bastards work out it is getting through to list subscribers.
For this reason alone I would suggest subscription becomes
compulsory.
There is no real reason /not/ to be subscribed. It
- Original Message -
From: Martin List-Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Vserver] Mailing List Future ...
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 18:11, Petar [Lists] wrote:
There is no real reason /not/ to be subscribed. It takes
5
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 19:10, Petar [Lists] wrote:
We all have a pretty good idea that the spam will increase and without
some form of moderation i.e. subscription, the list resource will
eventually become useless in that capacity.
My preference is not important. The overall aim is to have a
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:17:38PM +0200, Thomas Sattler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:51:14PM +1000, David Hill [Hostcentral] wrote:
OK enough is enough - the unsubscribe feature of Mailman is broken, but can
the admin please take me off this list?
remove my subscription too, please
Hi there ...
First of all. Herbert, I'm sorry. I should have written more than the few
lines I wrote to declare my request. I try to unsubscribe from the list
since, I don't know, several weeks. It is not because of some spam-mails,
currently I just do not have the time to read the list itself.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:15:18PM +0300, Eugeny Zadevalov wrote:
Hello!
I'm not a very active subscriber, and currently even
don't use vserver(i switched to freevps two month ago),
but I read this list to be on the bleeding age of this
technologies.
sounds interesting ... unfortunately we
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
hmm, I'd like to ask _all_ current members of this
list, about their opinion
i would not call me a member since i just read along but nevertheless
here's my opinion:
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
yes,
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
so, now the questions I'd like to get answered:
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
yes
2) do we want martin to maintain and further
improve the existing solution
no problem.
3) are we able to
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
i don't care
i can live with the few spam i get from this list
(which doesn't mean i don't think it's annoying though :-) )
2) do we want martin to maintain and further
improve the existing
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 06:30, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
I am happy with either solution.
2) do we want martin to maintain and further
improve the existing solution
Yes. The unsubscribe does
On Mo, 2004-06-21 at 14:30, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
so, now the questions I'd like to get answered:
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
YES, although this might be argued by some, i think people should not be
forced to subscribe,
so, now the questions I'd like to get answered:
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
I subscribe and so does everyone who got this message (since you sent it to
the list) so I suspect this will not have much impact on us who are
Am Monday 21 June 2004 14:30 schrieb Herbert Poetzl:
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
2) do we want martin to maintain and further
improve the existing solution
3) are we able to tolerate/ignore the unavoidable
spam
14 matches
Mail list logo
