1) Fair scheduling - as far as I can tell the VZ fair scheduler
does nothing the VServer QoS/Limit system does. If anything, the VZ
fair scheduler is not yet O(1) which is a big negative. VServer is
built on standard kernel and therefore uses the O(1) scheduler (an
absolute must when you
The kernel caches based on inode number. If you modified the caching
part of the module then I may be incorrect in my thinking. Take example:
# ls -ai /vz/private/1/root/bin/ls
41361462 /vz/private/1/root/bin/ls
# ls -ai /vz/template/redhat-as3-minimal/coreutils-4.5.3-26/bin/ls
1998864
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:44:43AM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
(will use Z for OpenVZ and S for Linux-VServer)
Factors of interest are
- stability,
Z: the announcement reads first stable OVZ version
S: we are at version 2.0.1 ( two years stable releases)
And all this
В Срд, 07.12.2005, в 16:34, Herbert Poetzl пишет:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:44:43AM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
(will use Z for OpenVZ and S for Linux-VServer)
Factors of interest are
- stability,
Z: the announcement reads first stable OVZ version
S: we are at
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 16:57, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
В Срд, 07.12.2005, в 16:34, Herbert Poetzl пишет:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:44:43AM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
(will use Z for OpenVZ and S for Linux-VServer)
Factors of interest are
- stability,
Z: the
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:57:31PM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
? ???, 07.12.2005, ? 16:34, Herbert Poetzl ?:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:44:43AM +0200, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
(will use Z for OpenVZ and S for Linux-VServer)
Factors of interest are
- stability,
FreeVPS stores pointer to context structure, at kernel object (more
work, debugging, but much faster access to data, that is needed for
each context switch).
hmm, again JFYI, linux-vserver uses both, context references
as well as xid information, wherever the one or the other
applies
Before I try OpenVZ I would like to hear comments of people
who've ran both VServer and OpenVZ, preferrably on the same
hardware, on how both compare.
Factors of interest are stability, Debian support,
hardware utilization, documentation and community support,
security.
My planned usage is
in selling virtuozzo than supporting the free openvz.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herbert
Poetzl
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:45 PM
To: Eugen Leitl
Cc: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: Re: [Vserver] VServer vs OpenVZ
On Tue, Dec
(will use Z for OpenVZ and S for Linux-VServer)
Factors of interest are
- stability,
Z: the announcement reads first stable OVZ version
S: we are at version 2.0.1 ( two years stable releases)
And all this time VServer need a hack for allow bind socket to
INADDR_ANY at VPS ;-)
Z
Let me comment on that as well (ccing our users@ mailing list). Sure I'm
biased as well :)
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:20:13PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Factors of interest are
- stability,
Z: the announcement reads first stable OVZ version
Although this is
11 matches
Mail list logo
