On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:55:31PM -0400, Chuck wrote:
also, have the vserver systems been tuned around a certain timer frequency?
100? or 1000? or in between somewhere? for best efficiency still allowing
remote terminal responsiveness under extremely heavy loads?
100 will give better
On Friday 15 June 2007 13:33, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:55:31PM -0400, Chuck wrote:
also, have the vserver systems been tuned around a certain timer
frequency?
100? or 1000? or in between somewhere? for best efficiency still allowing
remote terminal
On Friday 15 June 2007 13:33, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
any thoughts on my other question on cfq?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:55:31PM -0400, Chuck wrote:
also, have the vserver systems been tuned around a certain timer
frequency?
100? or 1000? or in between somewhere? for best efficiency
also, have the vserver systems been tuned around a certain timer frequency?
100? or 1000? or in between somewhere? for best efficiency still allowing
remote terminal responsiveness under extremely heavy loads?
--
Chuck
___
Vserver mailing list