Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-18 Thread Grzegorz Nosek
Hello, On a brighter note, the machine is rock stable and is humming along happily. so we can probably consider the previous issues a hardware failure/incompatibility and not linux-vserver related at all, right? The box died again, tonight (about 3am). Zero load whatsoever, no console

Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-16 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 05:18:48PM +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: 2005/11/14, Björn Steinbrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (Gentoo 3.4.4-r1, ssp-3.4.4-1.0, pie-8.7.8) Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Kernel config is attached (for the vs2.1

Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-14 Thread Grzegorz Nosek
2005/11/13, Björn Steinbrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've tried the instructions you gave in one of your previous mails (add a qdisc, then add a class [or whatever are the correct terms...]). And ran ping -f 192.168.0.1 from my box to my router. With 1Gbit rate and ceil limits, with 100Kbit limits

Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-14 Thread Björn Steinbrink
On 2005.11.14 14:23:54 +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: Hi Thanks for your info. The weird thing is that although I had limited eth0 traffic, the slowdowns occured at the lo interface (pingflooding between vservers). I now tried a local ping now, also works just as expected (i.e. unlimited).

Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-13 Thread Björn Steinbrink
On 2005.11.10 11:47:39 +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: 2005/11/9, Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hmm, smells like a mainline issue, to be honest, but if you have time (and the machine) we can do some more detailed investigations ... TIA, Herbert Hello I was thinking along

Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-10 Thread Grzegorz Nosek
2005/11/9, Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hmm, smells like a mainline issue, to be honest, but if you have time (and the machine) we can do some more detailed investigations ... TIA, Herbert Hello I was thinking along similar lines (AMD64 x2 are quite a new brand), but I thought that

Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-09 Thread Grzegorz Nosek
2005/11/8, Grzegorz Nosek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello all, 2005/11/7, Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: could you give me some commands to reproduce here? basically, it amounts to: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default fffe ... still working nicely...

Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-09 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 07:41:14PM +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: 2005/11/8, Grzegorz Nosek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello all, 2005/11/7, Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: could you give me some commands to reproduce here? basically, it amounts to: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc

Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-08 Thread Grzegorz Nosek
2005/11/7, Sam Vilain [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Strange. Certainly in terms of firewalling, packets that don't leave the host always travel via the loopback interface. I know, they also screw up netfilter debug messages :) I'd be curious if the same thing happens without vserver (eg, by just

[Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-07 Thread Grzegorz Nosek
Hello I'm experiencing a weird problem with htb and vservers. First, a bit about my setup: the machine is a dual-core AMD64 (2.6.13.4, vserver 2.1.0-rc4) running 8 guests (where all but 3 are mostly idle). The 3 active guests are: - d829 (a mysql server) - v830 - v831 (two apache vservers) The

Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-07 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:58:09PM +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: Hello I'm experiencing a weird problem with htb and vservers. First, a bit about my setup: the machine is a dual-core AMD64 (2.6.13.4, vserver 2.1.0-rc4) running 8 guests (where all but 3 are mostly idle). The 3 active guests

Re: [Vserver] packet shaping with vservers

2005-11-07 Thread Sam Vilain
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 13:58 +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: The test cases I've found are: - no QoS at all everything runs smoothly - root qdisc on eth0 set to htb (or pfifo, or sfq) still everything nice and smooth - default class on eth0 set to htb (rate 1Gbit, so it's not true bandwith