Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:17:47PM -0400, Fareha Shafique wrote:
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:17:55PM -0400, Fareha Shafique wrote:
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:46:34PM -0400, Fareha Shafique wrote:
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:17:55PM -0400, Fareha Shafique wrote:
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:46:34PM -0400, Fareha Shafique wrote:
After asking various questions about unification, I don't think
vhashify quite supports what I have
Risking to get off-topic:
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 23:20 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 12:35:38AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
why would somebody want to _share_ the host files with
the guest, instead of having a separate filesystem for
them?
This is actually how
You could use unionfs or bind-mounts to share directories
between host- and guest-filesystem. Of course this would
need some manuall work...
well, bind mounts should work out-of-the-box, basically
just add them to the fstab in the guest config
Well, besides having to compile the
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:46:34PM -0400, Fareha Shafique wrote:
After asking various questions about unification, I don't think vhashify
quite supports what I have in mind. I wanted to get some opinions/ideas
from the users of this mailing list.
I am thinking if vservers can somehow be
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:46:34PM -0400, Fareha Shafique wrote:
After asking various questions about unification, I don't think vhashify
quite supports what I have in mind. I wanted to get some opinions/ideas
from the users of this mailing list.
I am thinking if
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:17:55PM -0400, Fareha Shafique wrote:
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:46:34PM -0400, Fareha Shafique wrote:
After asking various questions about unification, I don't think
vhashify quite supports what I have in mind. I wanted to get some
Hi,
why would somebody want to _share_ the host files with
the guest, instead of having a separate filesystem for
them?
This is actually how Solaris 10 zones work. In a Solaris 10
zone the filesystems /usr /bin /lib and so on are read-only loop-back
mounts to the host OS. It makes
