Hello,
If we want to build new box with vserver on them, what version
stable/dev/prepatch should we choose ? We know the kernel has seen
some major bug squeeze those last weeks and stable version is laggin a
little in kernel version. So what is the best choice about this ? should
we stick
Hello,
I compiled kernel 2.6.18.3 with patch-2.6.18.3-vs2.1.1.1.diff on
debian-3.1-sarge-backports
Compil ok, starting ok but when i launch vserver vweb1 start, i got the
following errors which seems to be the same as Andreas Baetz.
I've read Herbert should fix it in the next release . It was
It looks like Ubuntu is no longer going to include kernel-patch-vserver in
the distribution. It's not in feisty.
The patch included in edgy does not apply to the stock linux sources
(2.6.17) and edgy does not include 2.6.12/2.6.13/2.6.15 which the patch
requires. And, there are no images at
On 21.11.2006, at 03:38, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
One more question...
Do I have to do something in order to enable 'masking' for bind9?
Bind9 works without problems, but after some time it freezes
completely, whis is not very nice...
nope, freezing is not nice, could you try to attach
'strace
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 10:28:27AM +0100, Adnet Ghislain wrote:
Hello,
If we want to build new box with vserver on them, what version
stable/dev/prepatch should we choose?
depends on what 'features' you require ...
(see http://linux-vserver.org/Feature_Matrix)
We know the kernel has seen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I compiled kernel 2.6.18.3 with patch-2.6.18.3-vs2.1.1.1.diff on
debian-3.1-sarge-backports
Compil ok, starting ok but when i launch vserver vweb1 start, i got the
following errors which seems to be the same as Andreas Baetz.
I've read Herbert should fix it in
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:43:13AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:28:42PM +0100, Andreas Baetz wrote:
Because of the CPU scheduling problems I have with 2.6.18.2 and vserver
vs2.0.2.2-rc6 I tried
2.6.18.3 and vs2.0.2.2-rc7.
The patch applied cleanly to a vanilla
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 11:30:33AM -0500, Philippe Clérié wrote:
It looks like Ubuntu is no longer going to include
kernel-patch-vserver in the distribution. It's not in feisty.
The patch included in edgy does not apply to the stock linux sources
(2.6.17) and edgy does not include
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 05:25:12PM +0100, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
On 21.11.2006, at 03:38, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
One more question...
Do I have to do something in order to enable 'masking' for bind9?
Bind9 works without problems, but after some time it freezes
completely, whis is
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:30 -0500, Philippe Clérié wrote:
It looks like Ubuntu is no longer going to include kernel-patch-vserver in
the distribution. It's not in feisty.
The patch included in edgy does not apply to the stock linux sources
(2.6.17) and edgy does not include
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:05:07AM +0100, Andreas Baetz wrote:
Hi,
I updated to another kernel (2.6.18.2) and another vserver version
(vs2.0.2.2-rc6), and I think the hard cpu scheduling doesn't work as
expected.
works here as expected (with 2.6.18.3-vs2.0.2.2-rc8)
What I'm trying to do
Hello,
We are developing a client/server (host/guest) application which makes
it possible for a guest to run a virtual iptables (the guest
application should replace the offical iptables binary).
This project is still at experimental stage and may not work as
expected, so use it at your own risk.
Hi Andre,
as you might know, there is a Webinterface to managed vserver called openvcp
(http://www.openvcp.org).
Because, I am a developer of the Webinterface I want to ask you whether we
could work together to implement this in our Webinterface?
best regards
Oliver Werner aka cryptronic
Am
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:33:44 +
Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:30 -0500, Philippe Clérié wrote:
It looks like Ubuntu is no longer going to include kernel-patch-vserver
in the distribution. It's not in feisty.
The patch included in edgy does not apply to the
On Thursday 23 November 2006 18:49, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:43:13AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:28:42PM +0100, Andreas Baetz wrote:
Because of the CPU scheduling problems I have with 2.6.18.2 and vserver
vs2.0.2.2-rc6 I tried
On Thursday 23 November 2006 20:29, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:05:07AM +0100, Andreas Baetz wrote:
Hi,
I updated to another kernel (2.6.18.2) and another vserver version
(vs2.0.2.2-rc6), and I think the hard cpu scheduling doesn't work as
expected.
works here
16 matches
Mail list logo