we are running vanilla kernels with the vserver patch on our Gentoo production
system (the 'big bertha' one).
currently this is 2.6.13.3-vs2.1.0-rc4
I see little bits here and there of 2.6.14 and some vs number being ready for
prime time.. I have been out of intimate touch with what is going
...
Hello. Some months earlier :) I wrote about VServer-based distro. Now I can
announce version 0.2.7.
Short description: RAD GNU/Linux is a gateway solution, but can be used as a
hosting platform or as a supervising system to run one or more secured context.
Network capabilities: PPPoE,
Peter V. Saveliev wrote:
...
Hello. Some months earlier :) I wrote about VServer-based distro. Now I can
announce version 0.2.7.
Short description: RAD GNU/Linux is a gateway solution, but can be used as a
hosting platform or as a supervising system to run one or more secured context.
skip /
OpenVPN ?
skip /
Planned. For this time I've got a request for PPTP, so, this build includes it.
OpenVPN support will be included in next builds (I think, in two weeks or like
that), 0.2.7 is not the final :)
--
Peter V. Saveliev
___
Quoting Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Enrico Scholz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enrico Scholz) writes:
| # auditctl -m 'foo'
| Error sending user message request (Operation not permitted)
...
This gives problems on Fedora Core 4 as recent pam
2005/11/13, Björn Steinbrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've tried the instructions you gave in one of your previous mails (add
a qdisc, then add a class [or whatever are the correct terms...]). And
ran ping -f 192.168.0.1 from my box to my router. With 1Gbit rate and
ceil limits, with 100Kbit limits
On 2005.11.14 14:23:54 +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote:
Hi
Thanks for your info. The weird thing is that although I had limited
eth0 traffic, the slowdowns occured at the lo interface (pingflooding
between vservers).
I now tried a local ping now, also works just as expected (i.e.
unlimited).
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:54:23AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Enrico Scholz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enrico Scholz) writes:
| # auditctl -m 'foo'
| Error sending user message request (Operation not
Quoting Herbert Poetzl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
ah, you are the one who is to blame for this mess ... :)
Well, I wanted to use lsm hooks, not capabilities...
For vserver, loginuid should probably always be reported along with
the vserver id, I guess...
patches to virtualize the loginuid are
Hi,
I run my vServer with DRBD - this means you can only have one actve
mount at a time, but in case of failover it takes less than a minute to
remount the backup node...
Oliver
--
Diese Nachricht wurde digital unterschrieben
oliwel's public key: http://www.oliwel.de/oliwel.crt
We are running with a GFS setup currently and it works good for the most part. Lustre will not work with vservers until the lustre designers get their stuff working in the kernel. That is the route we prefer to go but until that happens it just doesn't work. We have spent a great deal of time
QUESTION: what is the current story with multicast support for both
sending and receiving multicast traffic?
BACKGROUND:
trying to get tomcat clustering working in vserver.
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/cluster-howto.html
DETAILS:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] opt]# cat /proc/version
Thanks!
Just for documentation in case anyone gets stuck trying to fix this:
It looks like older FC4 pam will work with ^30, and newer (pam-0.79-9.6)
requires *both* ^29 and ^30. (Doesn't matter, BTW, whether you have
pam_loginuid.so in your config, it looks like it is patched to use audit
i've not gotten any farther.
any ideas?
drew
On Nov 14, 2005, at 3:09 AM, Drew Lippolt wrote:
QUESTION: what is the current story with multicast support for
both sending and receiving multicast traffic?
BACKGROUND:
trying to get tomcat clustering working in vserver.
14 matches
Mail list logo