On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:03:47AM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> Hi,
> I have serious problem with vserver 2.1.1-rc on SMP systems.
> I don't have UP system to check if it's an SMP-only.
> Kernel is 2.6.16.11, vserver patch 2.1.1-rc17,
>
> I can't run gdb. The following test case will give result
Hi,
I have serious problem with vserver 2.1.1-rc on SMP systems.
I don't have UP system to check if it's an SMP-only.
Kernel is 2.6.16.11, vserver patch 2.1.1-rc17,
I can't run gdb. The following test case will give results as shown
below:
gdb /bin/ls
r
and then you will see this:
From the x86
Hi Daniel,
> No, because it also adds the packages to pkgs/03, which is the third set
> of packages installed.
That's the info I searched for - and the place I missed in my environment ;-)
--
regards 'n greez,
Guenther Fuchs
(aka "muh" and "powerfox")
_
On Sunday 30 April 2006 21:10, EK wrote:
> I would like to assign 128-bit ipv6 addresses to each vserver. Does
> Vserver currently support ipv6 addresses? If not, is anyone working on
> implementing ipv6 address support?
Currently linux-vserver doesn't support ipv6 [1], but a patch is being worked
hello,
what i DID try to temporarily fix the problem and that did not work was:
vattribute --set --xid --ccap raw_icmp --bcap -1
something else i wanted to ask was:
Another point that i noticed is, that the df command is no longer
> > listing the /dev/hdv device. The output is something like:
>
I would like to assign 128-bit ipv6 addresses to each vserver. Does
Vserver currently support ipv6 addresses? If not, is anyone working on
implementing ipv6 address support?
Thanks
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linu
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:54:26PM +0300, Nikolay Kichukov wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Just upgraded to the latest development util-vserver release.
>
> However, when I try to vattribute, I am getting exactly the same
> behaviour. sshd is again not accepting connections. When I try to
> temporary fix the
Hello,
Just upgraded to the latest development util-vserver release.
However, when I try to vattribute, I am getting exactly the same
behaviour. sshd is again not accepting connections. When I try to
temporary fix the problem with --bcap -1, there is no update.
/usr/local/sbin/vserver-info
V
Guenther Fuchs wrote:
That means - how do the packages get installed then? As far as I understand
your patch it "just" adds the CRU repo - and that would mean, still a
"vyum -- install" needs to be issued, am I right?
No, because it also adds the packages to pkgs/03, which is the third set
of
Hi there,
> Just adding the repo isn't enough, because yum would prefer the packages
> with the right architecture, like kernel, udev, etc.
That means - how do the packages get installed then? As far as I understand
your patch it "just" adds the CRU repo - and that would mean, still a
"vyum -- in
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 02:53:20PM +0300, Nikolay Kichukov wrote:
> Hello Herbert,
> I see now. So traceroute cannot be used within a guest environment. I
> will try tracepath instead.
>
> One more thing I'd like to comment on is that, every time I issue:
>
> vattribute --set --xid --ccap raw_ic
Guenther Fuchs wrote:
Guessed that but didn't find the "when" - where did you add the relevant
packages / install lines? Into the "build" command ord did you add the
packages into the fc5 util-vserver distribution repository?
http://cvs.hozac.com/viewcvs/util-vserver/fedora-5/util-vserver-0.30.
Hi Daniel,
you wrote:
> vps-dev, vps-fakekernel and vps-fakepackages should be installed by
> default for FC4, FC5 and CentOS guests with my packages.
Guessed that but didn't find the "when" - where did you add the relevant
packages / install lines? Into the "build" command ord did you add the
p
Guenther Fuchs wrote:
Have added those to the FC5 HowTo. @Daniel - if those are easier to be
installed from your packes, pls feel free to change / add - thanks.
vps-dev, vps-fakekernel and vps-fakepackages should be installed by
default for FC4, FC5 and CentOS guests with my packages. I've upd
Hi there,
on Saturday, April 29, 2006 at 2:46:25 PM Veit posted:
VW> Thanks to Daniel's changes, vps-dev now works on FC5 and is available at
VW> http://naturidentisch.de/packages/fc5-vps/vps-dev/ (and via apt/yum,
VW> too).
Have added those to the FC5 HowTo. @Daniel - if those are easier to be
On Sunday 30 April 2006 05:38 am, Daniel Kraft wrote:
> Chuck wrote:
> [...]
> > Checking `lkm'... You have 1 process hidden for readdir command
> > You have 1 process hidden for ps command
> > chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
> [...]
>
> See my message in this ML from 2006-
On Sunday 30 April 2006 06:18 am, Nikolay Kichukov wrote:
it appears it is a normal report. after discussion with the developers, i find
that our mail server runs many hidden/private processes momentarily and since
we have ssl/tls enabled this is a normal result on port 465.
> I hope that is n
I've tried to compile a debian package with grsec + vserver patch using
the standard "make-kpkg" method
I've removed content from "localversion-grsec" file because "-grsec"
create a conflict with "make-kpkg --append-to-version".
for example if you have :
fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-ver
Hello Herbert,
I see now. So traceroute cannot be used within a guest environment. I
will try tracepath instead.
One more thing I'd like to comment on is that, every time I issue:
vattribute --set --xid --ccap raw_icmp
on the host, I am getting the following error on the guest when I try to
ssh
Chuck wrote:
[...]
> Checking `lkm'... You have 1 process hidden for readdir command
> You have 1 process hidden for ps command
> chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
[...]
See my message in this ML from 2006-04-03:
###
Please keep in mind, that LKM seems to be a false positive
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 13:18 +0300, Nikolay Kichukov wrote:
> I hope that is normal and there is no need to worry. Nice one Chuck! ;-)
datalock:~# chkrootkit -q
datalock:~# uname -a
Linux datalock.powersource.cx 2.6.14.3-vs2.0.1 #2 SMP Sat Dec 17
02:37:41 CET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
Nothing here... ne
I hope that is normal and there is no need to worry. Nice one Chuck! ;-)
Regards,
-Nikolay Kichukov
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 23:23 -0400, Chuck wrote:
> i just ran chkrootkit on our vserver host and got this... i suspect this is a
> result of the vserver patches and is normal? or should i worry?
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
