Re: [Vserver] Another conceptual newbie question
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:38:57AM -0500, Corey Wright wrote: mv /bin/bash /bin/bash.new mv /bin/bash.new /bin/bash Do you mean mv /bin/bash /bin/bash.old cp /bin/bash.old /bin/bash ie a cp for the second command? I'm not totally familiar with vhashify semantics, but the two commands you wrote would leave the inode number unchanged, and so it would still be a hard link to the unified file. -- rgds Stephen ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] ssh is slow
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:31:05AM +0100, Gilles wrote: When I connect from the host to the guest through ssh, it takes 40 seconds before the password prompt appears. Check that the DNS server mention in /etc/resolv.conf in the guest is repsonding That shouldn't be the problem, as the guest's name is written in /etc/hosts. The guest needs to be able to reverse lookup the connecting machine (in this case, the host) details based on the originating IP address of the connection. Make sure your DNS is set up correctly and your guest configuration is set up for DNS properly. -- rgds Stephen ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] VServer forum
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:30:11AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: the main question is, do we need 'another forum'? Mailing lists are a lot better than web forums (IMHO). I've dropped out of more than one community when they transferred to web forums from mailing lists (although some people might not think that's a bad thing ;-)) I don't answer many questions here (2 or 3 in the past few months only) so my opinion isn't too important! -- rgds Stephen ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] VServer forum
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote: I use the gentoo forum as an example. It is large, very active, and I have yet *giggle* I offer tivocommunity and dealdatabase web forums as a counter example; most questions are responded to with do a search and two thirds of the search results are posts telling people to do a search! both have their strong and weak points... what would be nice instead of an interactive forum, but a bit difficult to implement, would be to create some kind of parsing program to parse the entire mailing list archives into a database, then present the database data in 'forum' form for easy searching Most mailing list software has a web interface for the archives of the list, and some provide a searchable interface. Hmm, we have an archive at http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/ and http://archives.linux-vserver.org/ I don't see a search option there, but I guess we could always make google index the pages and then have a google search option :-) -- rgds Stephen ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] ./testme.sh: line 115: which: command not found
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:14:49PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: hmm, always assumed that the 'which' command is part of every distro ... but hey, live and learn, maybe somebody has a workaround to avoid 'which'? Since you're using bash, use the builtin command type -p maybe? bash-2.05b$ type -p ls /bin/ls bash-2.05b$ type -p nosuchcmd bash-2.05b$ -- rgds Stephen ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Inconsitent handling of mounts with 2.4.31-vs1.2.10 on Fedora 1
[ Oops, sorry Herbert... my initial reply only went to you.. sorry! ] On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:43:37AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:03:39PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: use bind mounts because I want the vservers to only have read-only access to the filesystem, and bind mounts don't (or didn't, last time I tried) allow changes in permissions between the original location and the bound location. yeah, right, that's where my BME (Bind Mount Extension) patches come into play (fixing this mainline 'bug/feature') Does this patch work with the 1.2 series? I can't use the 2.0 series vserver because of my requirement for 2.4 kernels :-( # Select an unused context (this is optional) # The default is to allocate a free context on the fly # In general you don't need to force a context what defaults are those? That's what was created by the install-fc1 script which came with util-verser-0.30-0. guest. So will the request come from the guest's IP address, or will it fall through to the host, and the host make the request. the host will make the request, but with the guest's ip (NFS isn't really supported with 2.4/1.2.x) Yeah, it seems to be a little messy :-) well, it is how networking works right now :) I can understand _why_ things happen the way they happen, I'm just supprised it worked at all. I guess the Linux NFS server has a security issue; as long as the filehandle information works it doesn't check that the IP address matches the original mount IP address. In this case, luckily, good! Yeah, it's very annoying. Alan Cox has a lot to say about it! he probably has ... fixing it would be better, though :) The 2.6 maintainers don't agree with Alan, so there's an issue :-( I haven't checked the latest 2.6 kernels, but last month the issue still seemed to be unresolved. I'd _love_ to move to 2.6 and replace my FC1 system, but it seems I can't (or else pay money for USB enclosures...). -- rgds Stephen ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Inconsitent handling of mounts with 2.4.31-vs1.2.10 on Fedora 1
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:56:13PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:25:44PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:43:37AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: Does this patch work with the 1.2 series? I can't use the 2.0 series vserver because of my requirement for 2.4 kernels :-( there is a patch for 2.4 kernels, but it was not combined with linux-vserver (1.2.x) yet ... provided there is some interest and somebody (you?) is willing to test it, I see no problem to provide one ... I'll happily test! The host is an NFS server for my home network and doesn't do much else, so I can reboot it as needed, when I'm at home :-) That's what was created by the install-fc1 script which came with util-verser-0.30-0. hmm, how old is that package? It's the one downloaded from http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_release/v1.2.10/util-vserver-0.30.tar.bz2 [ Re IDE hotswap ] well, I don't remember an IDE hotplug standard by default, I know that some SATA enclosures support it ... but hey In the 2.4 series you could do % hdparm -b 0 /dev/hdg dev/hdg: setting bus state to 0 (off) busstate = 0 (off) and that would turn off the IDE bus (from the kernel perspective) allowing you to swap disks on that bus (so something like a hotswap enclosure is fine, ensuring you remove physical power from the device before swapping it). Then you can do another hdparm and the kernel would redetect devices on that IDE bus: % hdparm -b 1 /dev/hdg /dev/hdg: setting bus state to 1 (on) busstate = 1 (on) And the following shows in dmesg output: Probing IDE interface ide3... hdg: Maxtor 6Y120P0, ATA DISK drive ide: drives found on hot-added interface. blk: queue c03462fc, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0x) hdg: attached ide-disk driver. hdg: host protected area = 1 hdg: 240121728 sectors (122942 MB) w/7936KiB Cache, CHS=238216/16/63, UDMA(133) there is the source, use it ... Unfortunately the changes between 2.4 and 2.6 make this non-trivial :-( My memory is saying that /dev/hdg (in my case) becomes unusable after the bus state is turned off, so we can't add the device back again, and this is quite low level in the device management handler. (But I could be wrong!) -- rgds Stephen ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Inconsitent handling of mounts with 2.4.31-vs1.2.10 on Fedora 1
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 01:55:30AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:56:20AM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: [root]/home/sweh backup.pts/2% mount -r backup:/RedHat/updates/core1 /vservers/webssh/RedHat no idea 'what' filesystem you did mount here, but to me it looks like a network filesystem (i.e. nfs) Yes, it is. In fact it's an NFS mount from myself to myself; I can't use bind mounts because I want the vservers to only have read-only access to the filesystem, and bind mounts don't (or didn't, last time I tried) allow changes in permissions between the original location and the bound location. backup.pts/2% vserver webssh enter SIOCSIFBRDADDR: Cannot assign requested address SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address this is a good sign of a broken config (network wise) Network wise, it actually works. I had thought this had come from the guest OS trying to do stuff, but I'm a vserver newbie. Hmm. Ah... maybe it's because I'm using a 10.* address but have a 255.255.255.0 netmask; I left IPROOTMASK and IPROOTBCAST unset, so _maybe_ it's attempting to calculate based on a 255.0.0.0 mask, and failing to set them. Hmm, no, that's not it. I just tried. Could this be ipv6, perhaps? I'm not using ipv6. I had noticed that inside the vserver, an ifconfig -a shows _all_ the hosts IP addresses, and not just the one in the vserver. But otherwise it all works. ipv4root is now 10.0.0.2 This is the correct address. New security context is 49173 and just as sidenote, you should avoid dynamic context ids, unless you are looking for trouble :) OK; I'm new vserver newbie and just took the defaults which said # Select an unused context (this is optional) # The default is to allocate a free context on the fly # In general you don't need to force a context but I'll take your advice and have assigned fixed contexts now (10001 and 10002). bash: ulimit: core file size: cannot modify limit: Invalid argument this looks evem more like a debian^Wconfig issue, where you specified a limit (maybe -H or -S) without raising the proper other limit (specify -HS to solve that) No, it appears to be from my .profile inside the guest. For historical reasons I had ulimit -Sc unlimited for my own account, and this seems to be read when entering the guest. this is a different IP than the one before, NFS isn't handled that well on 2.4, but of course, the guest will send requests with 10.0.0.3 now, which, in turn might lead to the Permission denied (if your server does not allow 10.0.0.3 to access the share) The server allows the whole 10.0.0.* network (my home network). Will the guest make a request? The guest hasn't actually made the mount; the host has made the mount and has made it available to the guest. So will the request come from the guest's IP address, or will it fall through to the host, and the host make the request. Ah, OK... some network snooping... the request comes from the guest IP address. That's... broken! The mount came from the host IP address but the nfs requests came from the guest IP adrress. Hmm.. I'm surprised it ever worked! OK, what's the best way of providing a filesystem to the guest with read-only privs? Clearly NFS is a kludge. Huh.. that's odd... I just shut down _all_ vservers and restarted them and now the mount works in both vserver instances that seems like something confused, but I can probably live with it; my mounts have so far worked. But it does look like I need better solution; how to make a filesystem available to a vserver with differnt permissions than the host has? hmm, and IDE hotswapping did work with 2.4 but does not with 2.6? interesting ... Yeah, it's very annoying. Alan Cox has a lot to say about it! -- rgds Stephen ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
