On Wednesday 06 December 2006 21:50, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:11:44PM +0100, Andreas Baetz wrote:
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 15:54, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:11:35AM +0100, Andreas Baetz wrote:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 23:22, Herbert
ok. i am definitely having problems with this new opteron machine we have...
only thing i can see remotely close to an error or warning msg is this from
the kernel:
i get this message as early in the boot process as when it decompresses to
begin boot:
kernel mapping table up to 100,000,000
On Thu December 7 2006 07:57, Chuck wrote:
ok. i am definitely having problems with this new opteron machine we have...
only thing i can see remotely close to an error or warning msg is this from
the kernel:
i get this message as early in the boot process as when it decompresses to
I've been using the update-world script for quite a while. It works
fine on all of my vserver hosts and guests. It looks like you have
some kind of corruption with your world file.
Did you try doing what the output suggests? It says to run 'emaint
--check world'
-John
On 12/7/06, Daniel
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:57:41AM -0500, Chuck wrote:
ok. i am definitely having problems with this new opteron machine we have...
only thing i can see remotely close to an error or warning msg is this from
the kernel:
i get this message as early in the boot process as when it
On Thursday 07 December 2006 13:38, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:57:41AM -0500, Chuck wrote:
ok. i am definitely having problems with this new opteron machine we
have...
only thing i can see remotely close to an error or warning msg is this
from
the kernel:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:56:40PM +0100, Robert Michel wrote:
Salve Herbert!
Herbert Poetzl schrieb am Dienstag, den 28. November 2006 um 16:03h:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 04:24:10PM +0100, Robert Michel wrote:
Salve *, Herbert!
I like the power of linux-vserver and I do not to
On Thursday 07 December 2006 23:03, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
2.6.19 is now stable. this is still the proper patch?
vs2.2.0-rc2
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 07:06:29PM -0500, Chuck wrote:
On Thursday 07 December 2006 13:38, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:57:41AM -0500, Chuck
On Thursday 07 December 2006 23:33, Chuck wrote:
also what version tools should i use with this? i currently have
0.30.211
On Thursday 07 December 2006 23:03, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
2.6.19 is now stable. this is still the proper patch?
vs2.2.0-rc2
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 07:06:29PM
