On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:40:11PM -0500, Chuck wrote:
On Thursday 07 December 2006 23:33, Chuck wrote:
also what version tools should i use with this? i currently have
0.30.211
0.30.212 would be fine ...
best,
Herbert
On Thursday 07 December 2006 23:03, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
ok. i am definitely having problems with this new opteron machine we have...
only thing i can see remotely close to an error or warning msg is this from
the kernel:
i get this message as early in the boot process as when it decompresses to
begin boot:
kernel mapping table up to 100,000,000
On Thu December 7 2006 07:57, Chuck wrote:
ok. i am definitely having problems with this new opteron machine we have...
only thing i can see remotely close to an error or warning msg is this from
the kernel:
i get this message as early in the boot process as when it decompresses to
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:57:41AM -0500, Chuck wrote:
ok. i am definitely having problems with this new opteron machine we have...
only thing i can see remotely close to an error or warning msg is this from
the kernel:
i get this message as early in the boot process as when it
On Thursday 07 December 2006 13:38, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:57:41AM -0500, Chuck wrote:
ok. i am definitely having problems with this new opteron machine we
have...
only thing i can see remotely close to an error or warning msg is this
from
the kernel:
On Thursday 07 December 2006 23:03, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
2.6.19 is now stable. this is still the proper patch?
vs2.2.0-rc2
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 07:06:29PM -0500, Chuck wrote:
On Thursday 07 December 2006 13:38, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:57:41AM -0500, Chuck
On Thursday 07 December 2006 23:33, Chuck wrote:
also what version tools should i use with this? i currently have
0.30.211
On Thursday 07 December 2006 23:03, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
2.6.19 is now stable. this is still the proper patch?
vs2.2.0-rc2
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 07:06:29PM
