Re: [Vyatta-users] Problem sending prefixes to my upstream provider

2008-02-29 Thread Aubrey Wells
Connected means defined directly on an interface on your router. because 117.120.0.0/21 is defined directly on a router interface (eth1) your static route will never work. A connected route takes preference over a static one. because of this, the route is not installed in the routing table

Re: [Vyatta-users] Problem sending prefixes to my upstream provider

2008-02-29 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi, Thanks! It works now! Basically it is really now a simple setup where my eth0 is connected to my upstream and my eth1 will eventually be connected to a layer3 switch which are able to do IP VLAN and the rest of my servers will be connected to a layer2 switch. So will my config works in this

Re: [Vyatta-users] Problem sending prefixes to my upstream provider

2008-02-29 Thread Justin Fletcher
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Poh Yong Hwang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So the docs talking about Originating a route to eBGP Neighbours where it uses static instead of connected is not really correct? Sorry, trying to understand the difference between using a static route compared to using a

[Vyatta-users] Problem sending prefixes to my upstream provider

2008-02-28 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi, I have problem sending prefixes to my upstream provider based on the docs on Originating route to eBGP neighbours. My prefixes is as follows 117.120.0.0/21 and here is my detail configuration: protocols { bgp { bgp-id: 203.192.163.146 local-as: 7595