On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Andres Riancho
wrote:
> Steve,
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Steve Pinkham
> wrote:
>> On 01/27/2011 03:49 AM, Taras wrote:
>> <---snip--->
>>> cons
>>> 1. svn up from trunk is not always good idea because it can make problems
>>> for user (trunk usuall
Steve,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Steve Pinkham wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 03:49 AM, Taras wrote:
> <---snip--->
>> cons
>> 1. svn up from trunk is not always good idea because it can make problems
>> for user (trunk usually is for development)
>
> This is also my main concern with the featur
On 01/27/2011 03:49 AM, Taras wrote:
<---snip--->
> cons
> 1. svn up from trunk is not always good idea because it can make problems for
> user (trunk usually is for development)
This is also my main concern with the feature. The 3 main failure modes
I've seen in the past with my own w3af updates
Taras,
Please read inline,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Taras wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> It is good and in same time discrepant feature.
>
> pros
> user now don't need to make every time 'svn up' and will have fresh w3af
Agreed. Also, users that don't even know about SVN, or performed a
Hi, all!
It is good and in same time discrepant feature.
pros
user now don't need to make every time 'svn up' and will have fresh w3af
cons
1. svn up from trunk is not always good idea because it can make problems for
user (trunk usually is for development)
2. what about packaged versions of w3
