On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:27:04AM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 08:39:19 Jordan Justen wrote:
> >> Previously -V 1.40 would be treated the same as -V 5.0.
> >>
> >> Instead, whenever a minor version is requested gr
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 08:39:19 Jordan Justen wrote:
>> Previously -V 1.40 would be treated the same as -V 5.0.
>>
>> Instead, whenever a minor version is requested greater
>> than 9, bump the major version, and use 0 for the minor
>> versi
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 08:39:19 Jordan Justen wrote:
> Previously -V 1.40 would be treated the same as -V 5.0.
>
> Instead, whenever a minor version is requested greater
> than 9, bump the major version, and use 0 for the minor
> version.
>
> This leads to -V 1.40 being interpreted as -V 2.0.
>
Previously -V 1.40 would be treated the same as -V 5.0.
Instead, whenever a minor version is requested greater
than 9, bump the major version, and use 0 for the minor
version.
This leads to -V 1.40 being interpreted as -V 2.0.
Alternatively, we might treat minor versions greater
than 9 as an err
4 matches
Mail list logo