Emil,
I'm finished reviewing for today, and am stopping here at patch 16. I'll
resume reviewing tomorrow.
I see that you're collecting reviewed-by tags and cleanups on versioned
brancehs (for-upstream-3.*). I will defer cherry-picking patches off the
mailing list onto master; and instead will wai
On 07/07/2014 10:28 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> +/*
> + * strerror_r (strictly speaking not C99)
^^
You documented what's wrong with defining strerror_r in a C99
compatibility header. But it would be nice to also document what's
*right*. Maybe say "Not in C9
On 07/07/2014 10:28 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> +#define strcasecmp _stricmp
> +#define snprintf c99_snprintf
...
> +static inline int
> +c99_vsnprintf(char* str, size_t size, const char* format, va_list ap)
Did you intentionally omit `#define vsnprintf c99_vsnprintf`? If so,
then please document w
Patches 12 and 13 are
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace
___
waffle mailing list
waffle@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/waffle
Makes sense to me. Patch 11/33 is
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace
___
waffle mailing list
waffle@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/waffle
On 07/15/2014 07:44 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> On 07/07/14 18:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Some of our third_party libraries may be build without it thus we'll
>> fail at
>> link tim.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
>> ---
>> cmake/Modules/WaffleDefineCompilerFlags.cmake | 2 ++
>> 1 file change
Patch 8/33 is
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace
___
waffle mailing list
waffle@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/waffle
On 07/07/2014 10:28 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> The variable i is used as and compared vs unsigned int.
> Change it's type so silcence the compiler warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
> ---
> src/utils/wflinfo.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/uti
Patch 7/33 is
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace
___
waffle mailing list
waffle@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/waffle
On 07/07/2014 10:28 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Chad, do you have a plan/idea how to handle this ? I'm assuming that
> your plan is to tackle this once waffle_init is gone/replaced with a
> better solution (issue #7).
There appears to be a straightforward solution: add a new API call
waffle_finish(
On 15 July 2014 19:09, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> On 15/07/14 18:14, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> On 15/07/14 17:30, Jose Fonseca wrote:
[snip]
>> I would appreciate if you can find out where SDKDDKVer.h and windows.h are
>> located for the v120 toolset and which program provided them.
>
>
> Here it is:
>
11 matches
Mail list logo