On 01/06/2008, at 10:55 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
lightweight excludes it, but it's because it has classes shared
between webdav and http.
I think maybe I'll move therm into http and just have webdav depend
on http.
Actually, since that would drag in both providers, probably
undesirably, I'm just going to leave it as is.
- Brett
On 01/06/2008, at 6:16 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Just curious as to why we have a dependency on commons-httpclient
in wagon-http-shared?
That would cause a dependency on commons-httpclient in the wagon-
http-lightweight.
Do we want that?
- Joakim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
