List etiquette [was: Re: Starcraft Crashing Problem]

2005-01-02 Thread James Devenish
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 08:43:53PM +0800, Dark Servant wrote: Yeah it probably would be poor manners for someone to post a reply to a private mail onto the list if the person doing it actually noticed that the mail they received actually was private. But wouldn't

Re: List etiquette [was: Re: Starcraft Crashing Problem]

2005-01-02 Thread Robert Howells
On 02/01/2005, at 9:36 AM, James Devenish wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 08:43:53PM +0800, Dark Servant wrote: Yeah it probably would be poor manners for someone to post a reply to a private mail onto the list if the person doing it actually noticed that the mail

Re: List etiquette [was: Re: Starcraft Crashing Problem]

2005-01-02 Thread James Devenish
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:58:26AM +0800, Robert Howells wrote: On 02/01/2005, at 9:36 AM, James Devenish wrote: In the case of the WAMUG list, the list's software takes no position about whether replies should go to the list or to the personal sender. this list

Re: Non Reply To Posts

2005-01-02 Thread Onno Benschop
As one of the scary people posting here, I thought I'd add my reply after a large number of posts to provide my perspective on our little WAMUG community. Others have pointed out that you are not alone when you feel your question going unanswered. As a long-time member of this community I can

Re: List etiquette [was: Re: Starcraft Crashing Problem]

2005-01-02 Thread Onno Benschop
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 14:17, James Devenish wrote: Note also that the following appears in the posting guidelines at http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml : When you reply to a posting made by another person: 1. Did you only respond to the list - unless specifically

Re: List etiquette [was: Re: Starcraft Crashing Problem]

2005-01-02 Thread Dark Servant
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:58:26AM +0800, Robert Howells wrote: On 02/01/2005, at 9:36 AM, James Devenish wrote: In the case of the WAMUG list, the list's software takes no position about whether replies should go to the list or to the personal sender. this list

Re: List etiquette [was: Re: Starcraft Crashing Problem]

2005-01-02 Thread James Devenish
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 04:06:28PM +0800, Dark Servant wrote: I do not consider it bad manners to not notice that a mail has been sent privately. !!! I hope everyone (including you) does the courtesy of paying attention! If you reproduce private messages in the

Wireless Network Products

2005-01-02 Thread Andrew Schox
Greetings, and happy new year to all! At home, I have an ethernet network in our office with ADSL. My daughter needs a new PC laptop for school, which has wireless (802.11) built in (unfortunately Macs are not an option). Since we also have an iBook and another PC laptop with wireless installed,

Re: Wireless Network Products

2005-01-02 Thread Greg Sharp
On 2/1/05 9:00 PM, Andrew Schox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My potential problem is that we have a largish, two storey house, and it would be nice to have access from anywhere in the house (and preferably out near the pool, too!). I've heard of problems with Airports in this regard. Can

Re: Tsunami, WAMUG Posts and New Year

2005-01-02 Thread Jon Bjorn
Just to add to Reg's links, The Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake has more statistics and information about this terrible disaster. Enjoy your LSL Reg Jon On 1/1/05 9:44 PM, Reg Whitely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you Mike for the great tsunami references @