If you install the latest security update (Security Update 1-26-04)
you'll need go around and check your default internet applications, if
you use Safari and Mail as your apps. This means you'll have visit
Safari and Mail's Preferences and check their General settings. Mine
defaulted
Apple released a Security Update for Mac OS X today:
Security Update 2004-01-26 delivers a number of security enhancements
and is recommended for all Macintosh users. This update includes the
following components: Apache 1.3, Classic, Mail, Safari, Windows File
Sharing
Additionally
were woken
with a torch being shone through our bedroom window. It wasn't the kids
and wasn't the police so the next morning we rang up the security
screen company and had full security screens and triple lock doors
fitted. It's a bit like living in a cage now but at least we can open
the doors
Apple has posted Security Update 2003-12-19 which is available from
'Software Update' under your Apple menu (3.6Mb).
According to Mac Rumors this update includes the following components:
AFP Server, ASN.1 Decoding for PKI, cd9660.util, Directory Services,
fetchmail, fs_usage, rsync
Unfortunately Apple doesn't have a fix out yet, though they're
apparently working on it.
http://www.carrel.org/dhcp-vuln.html
Craig Ringer
From Macintouch today
The security warning that Microsoft should issue
http://www.infowarrior.org/articles/2003-02.html
Hi...
Just a reminder that you should back up your websites and make sure
you've installed all the security updates before this weekend as
there's a competition running in the US which offers a prize for
defacing web sites (and extra points for defacing Mac web sites :(
one Mac web site
On 04/7/03 10:22 AM, Shay Telfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi...
Just a reminder that you should back up your websites and make sure
you've installed all the security updates before this weekend as
there's a competition running in the US which offers a prize for
defacing web sites
On 04/7/03 10:22 AM, Shay Telfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi...
Just a reminder that you should back up your websites and make sure
you've installed all the security updates before this weekend as
there's a competition running in the US which offers a prize for
defacing web sites (and extra
Michel, et al,
Curious whether this security update has/is still causing problems?
Wanted to update, but feeling a bit uneasy if it is going to shut me out of
my PowerBook!
Regards,
Kent
On 11/6/03 4:36 PM, Michael Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apple released a security update yesterday
Michel, et al,
Curious whether this security update has/is still causing problems?
Wanted to update, but feeling a bit uneasy if it is going to shut me out of
my PowerBook!
Regards,
Kent
They've re-released the security update to fix that problem. It's
amazing the difference 2 bytes can
Apple released a security update yesterday (10 June) which I installed on my
G3 PowerBook 400, OS 10.2.6.
Secure was right - the computer wouldn't let me log-on. I'd key in my
password (as you do) and press log-in (as you do), and the screen would
shimmy. I tried repairing permissions by using
I seem to have forgotten the old password on my PowerBook's Password
Security Control Panel. The machine is not locked at the moment but
I'm going to need this facility again soon.
Can you just replace the control panel or is the password /
encryption a little deeper than that...
Cheers
with OSX?
Also we have set the opening to require a username/password and
separated the admin functions to a seperate account.
Are there any other security features that anyone recommends we use?
Cheers
Aurora
screensaver delay 1 minute, energy saver delay 2 minutes).
Also we have set the opening to require a username/password and
separated the admin functions to a seperate account.
Are there any other security features that anyone recommends we use?
Ensure you've installed the latest security updates using
Sharing is enabled. Printer Sharing is not
enabled by default on Mac OS X or Mac OS X Server.
Fixed in: Mac OS X 10.2.3 and Mac OS X Server 10.2.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
===
AUSCERT External Security Bulletin
Hi Wamug,
Those using Mozilla should read this !
Security hole !
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/09/16/1032054751392.html
Have fun
Bob
Last week I downloaded the latest OS X security update and installed.
Since then the following has ocurred:-
1. Family network via IPNetShareX have been unable to connect to the
net via my TiBook (G4, 400, 512 Ram) which can connect to the net via
internal 56K modem
2. Software Update cannot
Just announced via VersionTracker is a security fix for the recent
potential security problem affecting Apple's software update mechanism.
This fix is for OS X.
This update is not yet available via software update. You must manually
download and install it yourself.
It (strangely
On Monday, July 15, 2002, at 09:59 , Shay Telfer wrote:
Just don't install it if you haven't already installed all the
previous updates you're going to need, otherwise it'll just ignore
them as they're not encrypted!
Hopefully they'll cryptographically sign all their old updates but still
Just announced via VersionTracker is a security fix for the recent
potential security problem affecting Apple's software update mechanism.
This fix is for OS X.
This update is not yet available via software update. You must manually
download and install it yourself.
It (strangely
being.
Very, very, very bad of Apple to allow this sort of security breach!
No encryption in the update engine - how could Apple do that?!
(Assuming all of this is verified - it certainly sounds pretty dinkum)
:-(
-Mart
--
-
Martin
on 9/7/02 11:02, Martin Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the moment, you'd better not run Apple's automatic Software
update under OS X (or Mac OS 9 for that matter).
These articles detail that there is no encryption employed by Apple
for the Update system and thus it's trivial for a
://www.workingmac.com/inetd/164.wm
http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/280964
There is no patch available yet, so just don't run any updates for
the time being.
Very, very, very bad of Apple to allow this sort of security breach!
No encryption in the update engine - how could Apple do
Reading some subsequent followups, one poster indicates a hacker
would need to know the root password for your Mac to hack into it,
which if true means this may not be as major a problem as first
publicised.
you have to have root first folks
The very first step in the exploit requires you to
At 1:15 PM +0800 9/7/02, Shay Telfer wrote:
Reading some subsequent followups, one poster indicates a hacker
would need to know the root password for your Mac to hack into it,
which if true means this may not be as major a problem as first
publicised.
you have to have root first folks
The
It looks pretty serious and genuine to me. Once they have the
software running on the network, and you've installed the modified
version of the sshd, they can log into any account, even
administrator, and you won't know they're doing it.
You can always use md5sum to checksum your sshd against a
Is anyone else getting emails almost every day, said to be from Microsoft
with attached security update?
Are they genuine?
Michael.
At 4:12 PM +0800 19/3/02, Michael Hawkins wrote:
Is anyone else getting emails almost every day, said to be from Microsoft
with attached security update?
Are they genuine?
Michael.
No. Trash them.
--
Dr J.M. Cummins
Anatomy, Div. Vet. Biomedical Sciences,
Murdoch University
GPO Box S1400
NO, but TRASH THEM or you'll be in real trouble. They have been
linked with nasty little infectious habits!
Phil
Is anyone else getting emails almost every day, said to be from Microsoft
with attached security update?
Are they genuine?
Michael.
Got a Question? Try searching the WAMUG
Anyone REALLY concerned about the computer security report on 60 minutes
tonight?. Is 128 double overhead encryption really going to save us?
60 minutes isn't really the best place to learn about computer security.
Try http://www.cert.org/ or http://www.auscert.org/
Encryption is merely
Anyone REALLY concerned about the computer security report on 60 minutes
tonight?. Is 128 double overhead encryption really going to save us?
I avoid 60 Minutes wherever possible. What was the nature of the report?
--
Andrew Nielsen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Starfish Technologies Pty Ltd http
Anyone REALLY concerned about the computer security report on 60 minutes
tonight?. Is 128 double overhead encryption really going to save us?
I avoid 60 Minutes wherever possible. What was the nature of the report?
Some of it is available at nineMSN's web site.
Interestingly the consultant
on 11/2/02 1:01 PM, Shay Telfer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone REALLY concerned about the computer security report on 60 minutes
tonight?. Is 128 double overhead encryption really going to save us?
I avoid 60 Minutes wherever possible. What was the nature of the report?
Some
I guess one thing it did highlight, indirectly, are the problems related to
having no real competition to Microsoft. Considering their 'lacksy-daisy'
approach to system security, I am not surprised it happens so often.
They're unlikely to highlight that too strongly, being nineMSN (ie
Channel
Anyone REALLY concerned about the computer security report on 60 minutes
tonight?. Is 128 double overhead encryption really going to save us?
This is an old issue but it has surfaced again and may not be known to many
WAMUGgers. When you burn a CD you may be burning more than you think and
giving away [if you do pass the CD on to someone else] some of your private
data. Have a look at the _ Reader Report: Desktop DB Security_ at
Hello
Does anyone know of, or using, software that provides file/folder security,
similar to FileGuard, for OS X? Haven't found anything yet via
versiontracker.
Thanks
SPG
Hello
Does anyone know of, or using, software that provides file/folder security,
similar to FileGuard, for OS X? Haven't found anything yet via
versiontracker.
Run Disk Copy and create an encrypted disk image. Mount it and store
all the private files on that.
Really, for 'low level
Is there some way to activate a password request upon waking a Mac with
OS X? (similar to the passworded screen saver)
I can't see it anywhere and it seems like a major security failing if it
ain't there.
woz
At 11:50 +0800 10/01/2002, Shay Telfer wrote:
Is there some way to activate a password request upon waking a Mac with
OS X? (similar to the passworded screen saver)
I can't see it anywhere and it seems like a major security failing if it
ain't there.
On a laptop you can activate the password
At 12:14 +0800 10/01/2002, Warren Jones wrote:
I have the recently released openboot password protection installed to
stop booting off other drives without a password. But I know nothing is
100%. All you have to do is rip out the drive and whack it in another
Mac.
There's another way to bypass
I think it was this same MS post that generated an uproar amongst the
security community not so long ago. Microsoft is essentially arguing for
security through obscurity (don't tell anyone and they won't know) whereas
the security geeks were arguing that when security holes are found the
responses
301 - 343 of 343 matches
Mail list logo