Re: iPhone Terms Conditions

2007-07-12 Thread J Philippe Chaperon
Oops! Sorry Matt I again have forgotten to put in the correct WAMUG address!

Apologies,

Philippe C 


on 12/7/07 7:27 PM, J Philippe Chaperon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi everyone,
 
 Just to add to Norman's remarks, in Mauritius it is the norm to pay for both
 receive and make mobile calls although the mobile telephone numbers are
 clearly different to land-lines. At least that was the case 2 years ago, and I
 guess that Wendy can confirm this or otherwise.
 
 I just hope that we do not have such things here, and that Apple Australia
 will not tie their iPhone to a company and a plan that will exclude most of us
 'plebs'!
 
 Regards,
 
 Philippe Chaperon
  
 
  
 
 
 on 12/7/07 11:44 AM, Matthew Healey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 On 12/07/2007, at 9:05 AM, Norman Leslie wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Very interesting - one quick comment, however. It is customary to
 be charged both to make and receive calls on a mobile phone in
 North America - at least it was 5 years ago.  What is intriguing is
 that at the end of the day, the costs of operating a mobile phone
 worked out to be similar here and there - again that was the case 5
 years ago.
 
 I believe that's because in the US, mobile phone numbers are no
 different to regular land line numbers. This means the caller doesn't
 know what they are calling.
 
 Whereas in Australia, all mobile numbers are clearly designated as such.
 
 - Matt



-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: iPhone Terms Conditions

2007-07-12 Thread Wendy S. Austin
We used to pay to make and receive mobile calls a few years ago but  
with the arrival of competition, that has changed.   If we make a  
mobile call to another mobile phone using the same provider, there is  
no charge to the receiver.  However if we make a mobile call to  
another mobile on the competitors system, we all pay. At the  
moment though, the mobile companies are vying to get service  
contracts with the ex-pat pilot group and are willing to offer all  
sorts of incentives including no charge to the receiver no matter  
which company they are with.I have noticed our SMS is much  
cheaper than in Oz.


Wendy

On 12 Jul 2007, at 15:29, J Philippe Chaperon wrote:

Just to add to Norman's remarks, in Mauritius it is the norm to pay  
for both
receive and make mobile calls although the mobile telephone numbers  
are
clearly different to land-lines. At least that was the case 2 years  
ago, and I

guess that Wendy can confirm this or otherwise.


Wendy Austin  Thomas Oswin
Mauritius Island
Mob: +2302560182




-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


iPhone Terms Conditions

2007-07-11 Thread Matthew Healey
Lets just hope Telstra doesn't get the iPhone exclusively in Oz  
otherwise we will probably have even more draconian restrictions to  
look forward to.


http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/07/whats-hidden-in-iphones-fine- 
print.html


Those sorts of hidden conditions are enough to make me get a Windows  
Mobile device instead.


- Matt

-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: iPhone Terms Conditions

2007-07-11 Thread Matthew Healey


On 12/07/2007, at 9:05 AM, Norman Leslie wrote:


Hi,

Very interesting - one quick comment, however. It is customary to  
be charged both to make and receive calls on a mobile phone in  
North America - at least it was 5 years ago.  What is intriguing is  
that at the end of the day, the costs of operating a mobile phone  
worked out to be similar here and there - again that was the case 5  
years ago.


I believe that's because in the US, mobile phone numbers are no  
different to regular land line numbers. This means the caller doesn't  
know what they are calling.


Whereas in Australia, all mobile numbers are clearly designated as such.

- Matt


-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]