On 02/01/2005, at 9:36 AM, James Devenish wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 08:43:53PM +0800, Dark Servant wrote:
Yeah it probably would be poor manners for someone to post a reply to
a private mail onto the list if the person doing it actually noticed
that the mail
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:58:26AM +0800, Robert Howells wrote:
On 02/01/2005, at 9:36 AM, James Devenish wrote:
In the case of the WAMUG list, the list's software takes no position
about whether replies should go to the list or to the personal sender.
this list
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 14:17, James Devenish wrote:
Note also that the
following appears in the posting guidelines at
http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml :
When you reply to a posting made by another person:
1. Did you only respond to the list - unless specifically
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:58:26AM +0800, Robert Howells wrote:
On 02/01/2005, at 9:36 AM, James Devenish wrote:
In the case of the WAMUG list, the list's software takes no position
about whether replies should go to the list or to the personal
sender.
this list
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 04:06:28PM +0800, Dark Servant wrote:
I do not consider it bad manners to not notice that a mail has
been sent privately.
!!! I hope everyone (including you) does the courtesy of paying
attention! If you reproduce private messages in the
5 matches
Mail list logo
