ismail sutopo ,Bismilahirrahmanirrahiim. Ada Proverb Nabi Daud begini; Orang2 bijak2 dan berilmu,kalau dia kalah dlm perlombaan, dia mencari kesalahan dirinya..... tapi orang2 bodoh mencari kambing hitam.
Jadi begini Ismail, saya kira anda sudah banyak terpengaruh oleh ulama2 Wahabi-salafy yg sangat membenci Yahudi dan Nasrani semenjak dulu2 kala sudahmenjadi darah daging bagi mereka.... Sesungguhnya, yang merusak agama dan bangsa negara2 Islam pada umumnya dari pemimpin2 yg bodoh kalau dia pintar pasti tidak bisa dipengaruhi oleh orang luar..begitu bukan? Coba renungkan; apakah Wahabi-salafy yg menindas muslim Syiah itu adalah rekayasa zionis atau Amerika? Kalau begitu ulama2 Wahabi-salafy bekerja utk zionize dan Amerika doong.. Apakah FPI cs dan MUI menindas 500.000 muslim Ahmadiyah rekayasa Zionis pula? Apakah anda membeci saya dgn artikel2 saya karena anda direkayasa oleh zionis ? tidak bukan? karena anda sendiri bukan? Jadi mari kita jangan bermusuhan dlm berbeda beda tetap bersatu, binekha Tungga ika.Muslim itu bersaudara.. Coba anda tegur FPI cs dan MUI itu untuk menarik FATWA haramnya kpd Ahmadiyah,Syiah,Liberal dan pluralisme Insya ALLAH umat Islam ygb berbeda beda ini dapat saling bantu membantu seperti umat===Nasrani==yahudi==dan budha== Can you do that? yes you can --- In wanita-muslimah@yahoogroups.com, ismail sutopo <manmandir...@...> wrote: > > Pusat TERORISME adalah Negeri USA, neheri yang aman makmur damai sejahtera, > rakyatnya baik dan dermawan. Tetapi diam2 para pemimpinnya sudah kena sihir > ZIONIS untuk melakukan rekayasa di Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Indonesia > dlll yang notabene negara Islam semua. > > Islam dirusak dari dalam sebab ZIONIS itu paling takut Islam berkembang - > makanya setiap negeri Islam dibikin masalah sendiri dan beragam cara sesuai > kebutuhannya ... mulai dari peradabannya sampai ke masalah teror bom bunuh > diri, yang ternyata dari ledakan bom bunuh diri semuanya adalah bom Mikro > Nuklir - karena asapnya putih dan membumbung tinggi - akibatnya sangat > dahsyat dengan radiasi yang akan mencelakakan manusia beberapa tahun > kemudian itu. Siapa lagi yang punya kalau bukan Israel dan USA ? > > Dengan kekebalan diplomatik mudah sekali mereka menyelundupkan bom nuklir ke > negara2 Islam itu. Dan dibayarnya para pelaku2nya seolah2 orang2 Islam yang > Fanatik dan berjihad yang salah ... Jadilah malapetaka dimana2 ... > > Padahal Islam melarang membunuh manusia tanpa alasan yang jelas. Al Qur'an > mengisyaratkan bahwa seorang yang membunuh satu manusia - sama dengan dia > membunuh manusia seluruhnya ... Hati2lah ..jeas para pelaku bom bunuh diri > bukan orang Islam ..tapi pura2 jadi Islam ... Dia rela mati barangkali > karena keluarganya kebagian warisan ( bayaran ) jutaan dollar bukan ? > > Wallahu a'lam / ISLMAIL. > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:40 AM, abdul <latifabdul...@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Bismilahirrahmanirrahiim > > Seperti buah simalakan, kalau tdk dimakan, ibu yg mati, kalau dimakan bapak > > yang akan mati=====demikianlah keadaan Pakistan. > > > > Sebelum 11/9, Pakistan adalah sebuah negara yang menyokong Taliban dan > > memebsarakan taliban di Afagnistan dan di pakistan melawab Uni Soviet. > > > > Sekarang taliban membatu Al qaida musuh Amerika. > > Amerika berkewajiban untuk memerangi Taliban yg membantu Al qaida dan > > bahkan menyerang Amerika...baru2 ini. > > > > Setelah Iraq---> Afganistan---> kemudian Pakistan... > > Kalau pemerintah pakistan tdk memerangi dgn tutas taliban, Amerika yang > > akan masuk ke pakistan mengambil Taliban... > > > > Yang akan menderita adalah rakyat pakistan yg membesarkan TERORIS > > > > Semoga pengikut2 taliban sadar bahwa perjuangan taliban adalah bukan > > menegakan Islam tapi komunis...berbaju Islam. > > > > salam > > > > --- In wanita-muslimah@yahoogroups.com <wanita-muslimah%40yahoogroups.com>, > > "sunny" <ambon@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/09/AR2010050902447.html?wpisrc=nl_pmopinions > > > > > > Why Pakistan keeps exporting jihad > > > > > > By Fareed Zakaria > > > Monday, May 10, 2010 > > > > > > > > > Faisal Shahzad, the would-be terrorist of Times Square, seems to have > > followed a familiar path. Like many recruits to jihad, he was middle-class, > > educated, seemingly assimilated -- and then something happened that > > radicalized him. We may never be sure what made him want to kill innocent > > men, women and children. But his story shares another important detail with > > those of many of his predecessors: a connection to Pakistan. > > > > > > The British government has estimated that 70 percent of the terror plots > > it has uncovered in the past decade can be traced to Pakistan. That country > > remains a terrorist hothouse even as jihadism is losing favor elsewhere in > > the Muslim world. From Egypt to Jordan to Malaysia to Indonesia, radical > > Islamic groups have been weakened militarily and have lost much of the > > support they had politically. Why not in Pakistan? The answer is simple: > > From its founding, the Pakistani government has supported and encouraged > > jihadi groups, creating an atmosphere that has allowed them to flourish. It > > appears to have partially reversed course in recent years, but the rot is > > deep. > > > > > > For a wannabe terrorist shopping for help, Pakistan is a supermarket. > > There are dozens of jihadi organizations: Jaish-e-Muhammad, Lashkar-e-Taiba, > > al-Qaeda, Jalaluddin, Siraj Haqqani's network and Tehrik-e-Taliban. The list > > goes on. Some of the major ones, such as the Kashmiri separatist group > > Lashkar-e-Taiba, operate openly via front groups throughout the country. But > > none seem to have any difficulty getting money and weapons. > > > > > > The Pakistani scholar-politician Husain Haqqani tells in his brilliant > > history "Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military" how the government's > > jihadist connections date to the country's creation as an ideological, > > Islamic state and the decision by successive governments to use jihad both > > to gain domestic support and to hurt its perennial rival, India. Describing > > the military's distinction between terrorists and "freedom fighters," he > > notes that the problem is systemic. "This duality . . . is a structural > > problem, rooted in history and a consistent policy of the state. It is not > > just the inadvertent outcome of decisions by some governments." That Haqqani > > is now Pakistan's ambassador to Washington adds an ironic twist to the > > story. (And a sad one, because the elected government he represents appears > > to have little power. The military has actually gained strength over the > > past year.) > > > > > > In recent months Pakistan's government and military have taken tougher > > actions than ever against terrorists on their soil -- and Pakistani troops > > have suffered grievously. Yet the generals continue to make a dubious > > distinction among terrorists. Those who threaten and attack the people of > > Pakistan have suffered the wrath of the Pakistani army. But then there are > > groups that threaten and attack only Afghans, Indians and Westerners -- and > > those groups have largely been left alone. > > > > > > Consider the tribal area where Faisal Shahzad is said to have trained on > > his visits to Pakistan: North Waziristan, where the deadliest groups that > > attack Afghans, Indians and Westerners hole up. Although last year the > > Pakistani military took the fight to South Waziristan, a haven for groups > > that have launched attacks inside Pakistan, the generals have refused to go > > into the North, despite repeated entreaties from the United States and NATO. > > As far as the Pakistani military is concerned, there's always a compelling > > reason why now isn't the right time to go there. And the respected Pakistani > > journalist Ahmed Rashid, an expert on the Afghan insurgency, recently wrote > > in The Post that Pakistan continues to have influence with the Afghan > > Taliban and is using that leverage to force the Kabul government to do its > > bidding rather than to broker a peace between the Taliban and the Afghan > > government. > > > > > > Until the Pakistani military truly takes on a more holistic view of the > > country's national interests -- one that sees economic development, not > > strategic gamesmanship against Afghanistan and India, as the key to > > Pakistan's security -- terrorists will continue to find Pakistan an ideal > > place to go shopping. > > > > > > Over the past four decades, much Islamic terrorism has been traced to two > > countries: Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Both were founded as ideological, > > Islamic states; the governments sought legitimacy by reinforcing that > > religious ideology, and that made the countries hothouses of militancy, > > fundamentalism and jihad. That trend is slowly being reversed in Saudi > > Arabia, perhaps because King Abdullah could make it happen as the > > enlightened ruler of an absolute monarchy. It may not be so easy for > > Pakistan to overcome its jihadist past. > > > > > > Fareed Zakaria is editor of Newsweek International. His e-mail address is > > comments@ > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
